the DOH was forced in September of 2009 to reveal that Obama’s original birth certificate had been amended and that Obama or his representative has paid a fee to have his certificate amended. This admission was made in the form of a denial on August 18, 2009 to a UIPA request to release such accompanying documents for the amended filing. According to the OIP Manual, a State Agency can only deny the release of documents which actually exist; if they do not exist, they must explicitly say that they do not exist.
Since all Amendments must be noted on the certificate, an alleged image of an Obama COLB, which does not bear the word “Amended” is a forgery; and since the COLBs bear no such indication, the DOH must have known, this entire time, that both the Factcheck.org and Fight the Smears COLB’s are forgeries.
Where are the COLB loving Trolls?
We birthers should ZOT them with your post every time they bring up the phony COLB.
Question:
How would his purported adoption in Indonesia affect this? The reason I ask is that I am adopted, and any copy I get of my (Amended) Birth Certificate does NOT have the word “Amended” on it. The information re: my parents are merely substituted, and one cannot tell that I was ever adopted from simply looking at a legal, certified copy of my birth certificate.
Was there any indication of when the amending took place, btw?
Please note: I am a supporter of the work Polarik did in his image analysis. I’m not doubting the certificate is almost assuredly bogus. I’m just keeping in mind that there are many reasons for an amended certificate, and if done because of his adoption then the record of the amendment would be there, but the originals would be sealed (not by Obama, but by law).