Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jazusamo
Sustaining such a privilege would let an executive agency assert that anything it self-defines as its "mission" would be immune from scrutiny.

Well, yes. That's basically the point, isn't it? The funny part is when the author tells Dems they should worry about the "precedent" they'll send by not opposing Justice's behavior. *snort* As if.

5 posted on 01/13/2010 9:03:56 AM PST by workerbee (Yes, I hate Obama because of his color: RED!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: workerbee

Conservatives, inherently, wouldn’t do this sort of thing, and won’t use it to political or other advantage if they gain power.

This sort of thing is totally the purview of those that are goals oriented instead of rules oriented.


8 posted on 01/13/2010 9:06:32 AM PST by MrB (The difference between a humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: workerbee

Yep, the Dems are going to line up behind Zer0 and Holder.


9 posted on 01/13/2010 9:06:32 AM PST by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson