To: freespirited
I might get flamed for this, but I wish Rush didn’t take the bait. It’s the Dhims’ intention to drag Rush and Sarah to this race. So far, Sarah managed to stay away from it by refraining herself from endorsing Brown. Although I understand that it is very difficult for Rush (not to get into the fray) since his name is used in the ad. It would be better if someone else answer for Rush, I think.
2 posted on
01/12/2010 9:47:25 PM PST by
paudio
(Road to hell is paved by unintended consequences of good intentions)
To: paudio
Why? They’ll just lie about it anyhow.
4 posted on
01/12/2010 10:09:56 PM PST by
VeniVidiVici
(Gasoline is up 100% since the election of Barack Hussein Obama. Thanks, Democrats!)
To: paudio
Making ads using Rush Limbausg’s face is going to work like how all the Bush-Cheney-Rove-right wing extremest ads have worked for Coakley so far: NOT!
All they have gotten from constantly invoking Bush/Cheney is that from a 30 point lead just a few weeks ago, Coakley is now reduced to just 2% in the latest Rasmussen poll.
We gotta encourage these clowns to make even more Bush whacking ads. Them anti-Bush ads are working beautifully.. for Brown. Even people from the People's republic of Massachusetts are not stupid enough to think this election is about Bush o Limbaugh.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson