[Arthur Wildfire! March]

I'm glad I made it to the bottom — that's the most important part. Fraudulent enlistment in military is an interesting way of looking at it. Even fraudulent appointment. I'm no legal eagle, but the voter essentially appoints the Commander in Chief.

As for Jindal ...
Not eligible? Sorry to hear that.

[Arthur Wildfire! March]

It may ultimately fall to the military (who deserve to have a Commander In Chief who is in fact eligible to serve in that honored position and is legally capable of issuing ‘lawful orders’) to utilize the Uniform Code of Military Justice and demand that Obama establish the facts.

May I suggest Section 935. Art. 135. COURTS OF INQUIRY and possibly

Section 883. Art. 83. FRAUDULENT ENLISTMENT, APPOINTMENT, OR SEPARATION

Any person who—

(1) procures his own enlistment or appointment in the armed forces by knowingly false representation or deliberate concealment as to his qualifications for the enlistment or appointment and receives pay or allowances thereunder…

[links provided at the bottoom of article]

http://australia.to/2010/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=446:obamas-presidential-eligibility-scandal&catid=94:breaking-news

[Arthur Wildfire! March]

Thought you guys might be interested.