1 posted on
01/12/2010 6:06:25 AM PST by
kristinn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
To: kristinn
On a related note, is the LA Times ever going to release the video of Obama bashing Israel at a pro-Hamas rally?
91 posted on
01/12/2010 9:00:53 AM PST by
Carling
(Somewhere in Kenya, a village is missing its idiot.)
To: kristinn
Really? Like we didn’t know he was screwing around? It’s what he does. It’s ALL he does. All the time and he always will. Liberals are so stupid.
To: kristinn
Cover up it’s not what the media reports it’s what they don’t report,see cnnabcnbccbsmsnbc.
98 posted on
01/12/2010 9:36:34 AM PST by
Vaduz
To: kristinn
What’s a Huffington Post reporter? Zsa Zsa has reporters?
101 posted on
01/12/2010 10:21:25 AM PST by
OrangeHoof
("Barack Obama" is Swahili for "Bend over suckahs".)
To: kristinn
Executing such a story could have had consequences for the mistress's children, who were still minors. There was no way I would write something that I knew in advance would mortify a high school student in front of his peers. My mother's outrage and pain at the political sex scandal that had blighted her adolescence was just too vivid a presence.I am going to make an assumption that this same writer never protested about the abuse of Sarah Palin's children by the press. Just unbelievable (well, not really).
104 posted on
01/12/2010 10:53:45 AM PST by
torchthemummy
(No Obama: Not Because He's Black But Because He's Red)
To: kristinn
But how few of the Dems told the public and the NYT to ignore the McCain story.
Rationalize it all you want, Ms. Fowler, but you didn’t report the full story.
By the way, she refers to a political sex scandal her mother had to deal with. Since she brought it up, does anyone know that story?
113 posted on
01/12/2010 1:02:29 PM PST by
wildbill
(You're just jealous because the Voices talk only to me.)
To: kristinn
Therefore, I told myself, the presence of a mistress really does not tell us all that much about the rich relationship between Bill and Hillary Clinton.I'm calling BS (Barbra Streisand) on her rationalizations.
Absolutely right to do so, kristinn -- the presence of a mistress tells us an ENORMOUS amount, not just about that relationship, but about Hillary Clinton herself, especially after all the other mistresses/shenanigans over the years. To find out she is still allowing it says precisely what kind of woman she is, what we could have expected of her in the job as president. It was entirely appropriate for the electorate to know and unethical, at best, for this reporter not to disclose the information.
To: kristinn
ugh....the grifters... the gift that just keeps on giving...
122 posted on
01/12/2010 1:54:57 PM PST by
gibsosa
To: kristinn
Nuance about the dynamic Libs do love that word.
124 posted on
01/12/2010 3:59:17 PM PST by
razorback-bert
(Just call me mohhamed-bert when I am flying.)
To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
Huffington Post reporter Mayhill Fowler reveals today that she intentionally ignored reporting former President Bill Clinton's adulterous relationship with an unnamed mistress during his wife Hillary's campaign for the 2008 Democratic party presidential nomonation. Fowler writes she knew the state of the Clintons' marriage had national security implications as she notes that Democratic voters were falsely comforted thinking the former two-term president would be by Hillary's side in bed at the White House when the "3 a.m." phone call came. But that was not enough for her to report the truth so the voters could decide for themselves.
...but now that she stands to make a little cash, the story can be told. Thanks kristinn.
126 posted on
01/12/2010 7:46:08 PM PST by
SunkenCiv
(Happy New Year! Freedom is Priceless.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson