Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/12/2010 6:06:25 AM PST by kristinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: kristinn

On a related note, is the LA Times ever going to release the video of Obama bashing Israel at a pro-Hamas rally?


91 posted on 01/12/2010 9:00:53 AM PST by Carling (Somewhere in Kenya, a village is missing its idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

Really? Like we didn’t know he was screwing around? It’s what he does. It’s ALL he does. All the time and he always will. Liberals are so stupid.


95 posted on 01/12/2010 9:18:00 AM PST by Republic of Texas (Socialism Always Fails)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

Cover up it’s not what the media reports it’s what they don’t report,see cnnabcnbccbsmsnbc.


98 posted on 01/12/2010 9:36:34 AM PST by Vaduz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

What’s a Huffington Post reporter? Zsa Zsa has reporters?


101 posted on 01/12/2010 10:21:25 AM PST by OrangeHoof ("Barack Obama" is Swahili for "Bend over suckahs".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn
Executing such a story could have had consequences for the mistress's children, who were still minors. There was no way I would write something that I knew in advance would mortify a high school student in front of his peers. My mother's outrage and pain at the political sex scandal that had blighted her adolescence was just too vivid a presence.

I am going to make an assumption that this same writer never protested about the abuse of Sarah Palin's children by the press. Just unbelievable (well, not really).

104 posted on 01/12/2010 10:53:45 AM PST by torchthemummy (No Obama: Not Because He's Black But Because He's Red)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

But how few of the Dems told the public and the NYT to ignore the McCain story.

Rationalize it all you want, Ms. Fowler, but you didn’t report the full story.

By the way, she refers to a political sex scandal her mother had to deal with. Since she brought it up, does anyone know that story?


113 posted on 01/12/2010 1:02:29 PM PST by wildbill (You're just jealous because the Voices talk only to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn
Therefore, I told myself, the presence of a mistress really does not tell us all that much about the rich relationship between Bill and Hillary Clinton.

I'm calling BS (Barbra Streisand) on her rationalizations.


Absolutely right to do so, kristinn -- the presence of a mistress tells us an ENORMOUS amount, not just about that relationship, but about Hillary Clinton herself, especially after all the other mistresses/shenanigans over the years. To find out she is still allowing it says precisely what kind of woman she is, what we could have expected of her in the job as president. It was entirely appropriate for the electorate to know and unethical, at best, for this reporter not to disclose the information.
116 posted on 01/12/2010 1:16:38 PM PST by MozarkDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn

ugh....the grifters... the gift that just keeps on giving...


122 posted on 01/12/2010 1:54:57 PM PST by gibsosa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kristinn
Nuance about the dynamic

Libs do love that word.

124 posted on 01/12/2010 3:59:17 PM PST by razorback-bert (Just call me mohhamed-bert when I am flying.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; ...
Huffington Post reporter Mayhill Fowler reveals today that she intentionally ignored reporting former President Bill Clinton's adulterous relationship with an unnamed mistress during his wife Hillary's campaign for the 2008 Democratic party presidential nomonation. Fowler writes she knew the state of the Clintons' marriage had national security implications as she notes that Democratic voters were falsely comforted thinking the former two-term president would be by Hillary's side in bed at the White House when the "3 a.m." phone call came. But that was not enough for her to report the truth so the voters could decide for themselves.
...but now that she stands to make a little cash, the story can be told. Thanks kristinn.
126 posted on 01/12/2010 7:46:08 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Happy New Year! Freedom is Priceless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson