Skip to comments.
China: Missile Defense System Test Successful
Time Magazine ^
| Monday, Jan. 11, 2010
| AP / CHRISTOPHER BODEEN
Posted on 01/11/2010 6:59:30 PM PST by shader
BEIJING) China announced that its military intercepted a missile in mid-flight Monday in a test of new technology that comes amid heightened tensions over Taiwan and increased willingness by the Asian giant to show off its advanced military capabilities. The official Xinhua News Agency reported late Monday that "ground-based midcourse missile interception technology" was tested within Chinese territory. "We did not receive prior notification of the launch," Maj. Maureen Schumann, a Pentagon spokeswoman, said. "We detected two geographically separated missile launch events with an exo-atmospheric collision also being observed by space-based sensors. We are requesting information from China regarding the purpose for conducting this interception as well as China's intentions and plans to pursue future types of intercepts."
(Excerpt) Read more at time.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abm; airdefense; armsbuildup; bhoasia; china; chinamissile; chinesemilitary; missiledefense
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
To: Flint
This is ovewhelmingly Russian technology in this case.
In general, they mostly have adapted Russian technology, with quite a bit of French technology and some Israeli technology in a few critical areas.
The idea were it not for the Clintons the Chinese would be armed with rocks and pointed sticks is fairly absurd.
To: TexasFreeper2009
simple solution, use stealth technology to make missles that cant be intercepted.
All ballistic missles generate considerable heat from the simple friction of the atmosphere at the incredibly high speeds they're traveling - some going up, and even more re-entering the atmosphere. That's why ABM terminal seekers are infrared. There's really no way to make this heating magically go away or hide it, especially when the surroundings of the missile are so cold; the missile or re-entry vehicles are just too hot.
To: TexasFreeper2009
simple solution, use stealth technology to make missles that cant be intercepted.
All ballistic missles generate considerable heat from the simple friction of the atmosphere at the incredibly high speeds they're traveling - some going up, and even more re-entering the atmosphere. That's why ABM terminal seekers are infrared. There's really no way to make this heating magically go away or hide it, especially when the surroundings of the missile are so cold; the missile or re-entry vehicles are just too hot.
To: shader
Thanks Bill Clinton and LORAL for that guidance technology.
24
posted on
01/11/2010 10:37:33 PM PST
by
hattend
(Once we had Reagan, Johnny Cash and Bob Hope. Now we have Obama, no Cash and no Hope)
To: sickoflibs
In China the two parent family is promoted. So is savings. It doesnt have our freedoms naturally, but it is avoiding our insanity and breakdown. Chinese are much more conservative than Americans, yes, than Republicans!
"Conservative" of what? If you are a conservative of family tradition, then yes, one could argue that China conserves family tradition better than America...maybe...assuming you ignore little things like communist revolutions.... But what does it mean to be a "conservative" in America? For most people it means we are "conserving" the principles of the American founding--i.e., LIBERTY. So the fact that you admitted in your first paragraph that China DOESN'T HAVE FREEDOM, no American conservative should be particularly interested in whatever cheap crap they are "conserving". Got it?
To: Flint
“Aint it grand that the Clintons gave them the technology to accomplish such great things?”
That and the PLA’s Super 863 Project.
26
posted on
01/12/2010 3:51:00 AM PST
by
PIF
To: sonofstrangelove
They look pretty worried about some one to their north west... and not so worried about the east. Interesting.
27
posted on
01/12/2010 3:53:19 AM PST
by
PIF
To: newguy357
RE :”
But what does it mean to be a “conservative” in America? For most people it means we are “conserving” the principles of the American founding—i.e., LIBERTY.”
??? You are dreaming. Not in this country. In this country everyone has his hand out to the government, liberal and conservative alike. They just complain when it doesnt work or they think someone else is benefiting more than them. But we have democratic socialism. Under Bush it was spending and government growth will be paid for by tax cuts. Now we have O.
I was talking about conservative values like two parent families, work, savings, taking care of your parents, producing rather than consuming (my grandparents values). Yes, we have MTV and an entitlement society as values making believe it's freedom.
GET IT???
28
posted on
01/12/2010 5:02:04 AM PST
by
sickoflibs
( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is spending you demand stupid")
To: PIF
Nope, Tianjin is to the south east of Beijing, there are economic zones and high speed railways between the two cities, it’s not convenient for them to deploy missiles there
29
posted on
01/12/2010 5:02:44 AM PST
by
shader
To: familyop
Do you attend Free Day Away?
30
posted on
01/12/2010 5:23:48 AM PST
by
demshateGod
(The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
To: demshateGod
"Do you attend Free Day Away?"
I had to look that up. There was no such program for initial trainees of my MOS (bravo type) that I knew of, while I was there (long time ago, see tagline). There were religious services for about an hour (if I remember correctly) each Sunday, for those who wanted to attend. Trainees marched each way in formation. There were no passes for the 13 weeks (OSUT), except for the one pass of about a day and a half between phases 1 and 2. I was over 30 then, BTW. ...kinda proud of that.
31
posted on
01/12/2010 5:42:31 AM PST
by
familyop
(cbt. engr. (cbt), NG, '89-' 96, Duncan Hunter or no-vote.)
To: shader
I was thinking more on the lines of the USSR - they had several large scale border battles with hevy losses on both sides in that time period.
32
posted on
01/12/2010 8:11:10 AM PST
by
PIF
To: sickoflibs
“Completely different culture than Americans. In China education is social status”
Which is why it is a good thing that Stephen Hawking isn’t in America. He would have been euthanized while in China he’s a god.
33
posted on
01/12/2010 10:11:53 AM PST
by
Niuhuru
(The Internet is the digital AIDS; adapting and successfully destroying the MSM host.)
To: sickoflibs
Ok, then please do everyone a favor and move to your bastion of conservatism in communist China, genius.
To: newguy357
I would miss you and your conservative president
35
posted on
01/12/2010 5:56:33 PM PST
by
sickoflibs
( "It's not the taxes, the redistribution is spending you demand stupid")
To: PIF
Maybe its a possible trajectory of a Russian or U.S. missile warhead. that is the reason they are concetrating in that area
36
posted on
01/12/2010 6:05:03 PM PST
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Werner Von Braun)
To: PIF
Those are the remains of two belts of HQ-2 sites (The new Great wall) left over from the cold war remain active which now have S-300 missiles.
37
posted on
01/13/2010 1:06:49 AM PST
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Werner Von Braun)
To: sonofstrangelove
S-300 missiles — which are useless against incoming ICBMS.
Only the Russians have effective defenses against mass ICBM attacks and have been uprgading those systems since the mid-60s when they went operational. Nixon knew the Anti-ICBM Treaty was a farse when he signed it - good for political points at home and useful to stop real manned space flight endevours using nuclear power.
S300-S400 are the export models (and descended from) another secret not exported system used for defense against mass ICBM attacks.
38
posted on
01/13/2010 3:50:00 AM PST
by
PIF
To: PIF
The S-300 is a series of Russian long range surface-to-air missile systems produced by NPO Almaz, all based on the initial S-300P version. The S-300 system was developed to defend against aircraft and cruise missiles for the Soviet Air Defence Forces. Subsequent variations were developed to intercept ballistic missiles.
http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/russia/airdef/s-300v.htm
39
posted on
01/13/2010 10:13:38 PM PST
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Werner Von Braun)
To: sonofstrangelove
40
posted on
01/13/2010 10:16:38 PM PST
by
ErnstStavroBlofeld
("I have learned to use the word "impossible" with the greatest caution."-Dr.Werner Von Braun)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson