Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NORAD launches F-16s in response to unruly passenger
Fox News ^ | Neil Cavuto

Posted on 01/08/2010 1:22:03 PM PST by xjcsa

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last
To: bushwon

Well if they are scrambling F-16s for every drunk on a flight, you’ll be hearing about it once or twice a day.

Seems like a lot of tax money to make sure a guy doesn’t vomit with extreme prejudice on a stewardess.


41 posted on 01/08/2010 4:23:33 PM PST by worst-case scenario (Striving to reach the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: SJSAMPLE

So they have two modes now- ignore or overreact. Somehow, this is not comforting to me. It also shows me they still aren’t serious in the WH.


42 posted on 01/08/2010 5:42:11 PM PST by PghBaldy (Like the Ft Hood Killer, James Earl Ray was just stressed when he killed MLK Jr.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita

Good thing the fighters were able to catch up. Where were they on 9/11?


43 posted on 01/08/2010 6:36:52 PM PST by ineedanopusx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo
Looks like NORAD has gotten the word to launch ANG escorts for all incidents now.

Yep.

44 posted on 01/08/2010 7:05:16 PM PST by Screaming_Gerbil (Luke 22:36 "Then said he unto them...he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: worst-case scenario; PghBaldy

Maybe they are scrambling jets every time this happens to keep everyone sharp and make sure the system is working. Just a thought.


45 posted on 01/08/2010 7:09:42 PM PST by Screaming_Gerbil (Luke 22:36 "Then said he unto them...he that hath no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Screaming_Gerbil

Could be. Pretty expensive drill though - unless this has become the new method.


46 posted on 01/08/2010 7:14:28 PM PST by worst-case scenario (Striving to reach the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: worst-case scenario; Screaming_Gerbil

These aren’t a new form of drills. When the 142nd in Portland got the alarm for the flight to Hawaii on Wed they were surprised when it wasn’t called off before they took off and more surprised they made the entire flight.


47 posted on 01/08/2010 7:21:39 PM PST by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: jazusamo

Well, if f22s and F16s are being scrambled to accompany planess just because some bozo on it got drunk and abusive, I say: send the drunk tha bill. No reason we taxpayers should have to pay for it.

Good to know that these warriors are there ready to keep us safe.

What could they do, though, if there really was a terrorist on board? Shoot the plane out of the sky?


48 posted on 01/08/2010 7:29:14 PM PST by worst-case scenario (Striving to reach the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: worst-case scenario

I fully agree they should be charged for the costs and you’re right, the only thing they can do is shoot the plane down to save additional lives on the ground, should it come to that.

I don’t know and I’m only guessing but I have a hunch the order came down from high to NORAD or the FAA that fighter cover would be launched for these incidents. I say high because the One or his flunkies can say he’s doing something if something bad does happen, it’s the classic CYA, I could be wrong though.


49 posted on 01/08/2010 8:04:37 PM PST by jazusamo (But there really is no free lunch, except in the world of political rhetoric,.: Thomas Sowell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa

It was a muslim

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2424494/posts


50 posted on 01/09/2010 12:30:43 AM PST by icwhatudo ("laws requiring compulsory abortion could be sustained under the existing Constitution"Obama Adviser)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #51 Removed by Moderator

To: worst-case scenario
wouldnt it just be cheaper and more effective to have armed security on every flight ?

how does it help to shoot down a passenger plane just to save the white house from getting crashed into

but then again I am predjudiced , because 150 innocent civilians have much more value to me than the white house or any other government icon

52 posted on 01/09/2010 12:41:23 PM PST by KTM rider ( ..........tell me this really isn't happening ! !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: KTM rider

I agree with you there. Put armed air marshals on every flight, not just the overseas ones.

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/air-marshal-surge-race-time/story?id=9493323

According to this article, there aren’t enough of ‘em. I wonder how many this “surge” is going to enlist.

Of course that won’t help stop flights like the 9/11 attacks, which were originating within the US. There are about 28,000 US commercial flights daily, according to one article on air marshals I read right after Christmas.


53 posted on 01/09/2010 12:47:07 PM PST by worst-case scenario (Striving to reach the light)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa
(01-08) 21:01 PST COLORADO SPRINGS, COLO. -- A San Francisco-bound AirTran Airways plane was diverted with a military F-16 escort to Colorado on Friday after a belligerent passenger locked himself in the plane's bathroom, officials said.

It was the second commercial flight to receive a military escort this week and the third plane diverted because of a passenger disruption. The three incidents coincided with heightened airline security following a Nigerian man's alleged attempt to blow up a Northwest Airlines plane on Christmas Day.

AirTran Flight 39 left Atlanta at 10:36 a.m. EST with 132 passengers and five crew members. It was scheduled to land at San Francisco International Airport at 2:20 p.m. local time.

En route, the male passenger refused to follow crew instructions to return to his seat and locked himself in the rear lavatory, according to AirTran officials. They said he apparently was drunk. The FBI identified the passenger as Muhammad Abu Tahir, 46, of Virginia, according to the Associated Press.

The AirTran pilot diverted the plane to Colorado Springs. Two F-16s were launched by the North American Aerospace Defense Command Region to intercept and escort the plane.

Local law enforcement and FBI officials met the AirTran plane at Colorado Springs Municipal Airport just before noon MST and detained Tahir. Security officers then used dogs to search the plane.

Tahir was being held at the El Paso County jail, the FBI said. Federal charges for interference with a flight crew were expected to be filed Monday, the Associated Press reported.

After a three-hour delay, the AirTran plane left Colorado; it landed at SFO just after 5 p.m.

Also Friday, a Hawaiian Airlines plane bound from Las Vegas to Hawaii was diverted to Los Angeles after a man allegedly harassed another passenger. And on Wednesday, NORAD dispatched two F-15s to escort a Hawaii-bound jet back to Portland, Ore., because of a disruptive passenger.

Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/01/08/MNT41BFNFF.DTL&tsp=1#ixzz0c9Ugti3l

54 posted on 01/09/2010 1:18:15 PM PST by OafOfOffice (Constitution is not neutral.It was designed to take the government off the backs of people-Douglas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OafOfOffice

Mohammad.... there’s something about that name.....


55 posted on 01/09/2010 4:18:17 PM PST by La Enchiladita (The Light shines in the darkness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: bayliving
You sure it isn't those pesky Jehovah's Witnesses again? They can be a very persistent lot...

It can be startling when you hear one of them knocking on the outside of your window -- and you're on a plane.

56 posted on 01/09/2010 8:02:35 PM PST by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: KTM rider
wouldnt it just be cheaper and more effective to have armed security on every flight?

Yet ANOTHER case of a government "solution" causing the problem. Go back to the way it was in the 50's. Let everyone carry guns on, stop X-raying us and taking our temperature up our ass before boarding. Then if there's a problem on board that's unrecoverable, shoot down the plane. Seems unsporting to expect innocent people to accept getting shot down without allowing them the means to try and rectify the situation themselves first. See, there's almost ALWAYS a way to use freedom to solve a problem, and it ALWAYS works better than taking it away.

57 posted on 01/09/2010 8:12:06 PM PST by Still Thinking (Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita
"Moe Ham Head, go play outside .."

..take on an old Henny Youngman joke, him telling an uruly little brat on a plane to go play outside...

58 posted on 01/11/2010 8:58:50 AM PST by norraad ("What light!">Blues Brothers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson