Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: castlegreyskull

Carriers are the ultimate big stick, but the very fact that they are so big and impressive means that we can only make so many of them and they have their own limitations. The biggest of which is that they can only be in one place at a time.

I really wish we would spend more time looking at smaller and less expensive alternatives to the Nimitz and follow on carriers.

The Russian STOBAR concept is a great idea, IMO. Naturally they didn’t do as good as a job with it as we could, but that’s the Russians.

I expect we could build three of those things for the price of one supercarrier and give ourselves a lot more flexibility — but the carrier mafia running the Navy would never buy it.


17 posted on 01/08/2010 5:18:19 AM PST by Ronin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Ronin

Another consideration for the smaller carriers is that you will have to build more support fleets to go with them.


18 posted on 01/08/2010 6:03:48 AM PST by castlegreyskull
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson