Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lonesome in Massachussets
The shippers are third parties and shouldn’t be getting shafted.

I agree 100%. But they're not getting shafted by the drivers -- they're getting shafted by Arrow.

If I'm a driver, my primary obligation is to my company -- not their customers. If my company screws me and I think my only way to recover what is owed to me is to hold the company's assets and loads "hostage," then so be it. I find this kind of "can-do" spirit sort of refreshing, in fact.

18 posted on 01/06/2010 10:29:53 AM PST by Alberta's Child (God is great, beer is good . . . and people are crazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

The problem with that approach is that you end up on the wrong end of criminal liability. “He who sells what isn’t his’n, must buy it back or go to prison.”

In the U.S. wage claims are privileged in a bankruptcy vs. other unsecured creditors (assuming the company has any assets) so the drivers may get something, eventually.

The situation sucks, but taking it out on the shippers sucks, too. The drivers are clearly in a no win situation, but that happens to everyone once in a while. It would be a bigger mistake to compound the situation by getting a criminal record. Especially considering that a record for stealing freight would probably bar you from employment with any other trucking company if their insurers have anything to say about it.


20 posted on 01/06/2010 10:40:32 AM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (The CRU needs adult supervision.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson