What if this was a mother of nine, who was NOT on welfare? What would your reaction be to the same story?
Given those circumstances, what would the Obamacare board have done differently? Maybe ordered it a few kids sooner?
This woman doesn't need more children but the hospital, either intentionally or accidently, sterilized her. That's a lawsuit no matter what.
I suspect there is more to the story than what is disclosed here. Just a hunch.
This was no accident. They felt the same way about the sponge as you do, plus being products of the Marxist/Darwinist education system, harbor a strong hatred of children and unhindered human reproduction.
This mother is clearly dysfunctional and irresponsible. She wants another kid with her fiance?
But the solution is not to give her an unauthorized sterilization. That is a very Nazi thing to do. The solution is to straighten out our broken welfare system, which encourages single women to have affairs and kids with the assurance that the taxpayes will pick up the tab. It’s not fair to the taxpayers, and it’s not fair to the kids. And it leads to irresponsible behavior just like this.
But involuntary sterilization? No.
I have one question:
Why isn’t this implemented on Ca??
I might take one of my “wise latina” cousin to this hospital :O
j/k
It is a uterus not a clown car.
The most amazing aspect to this story is that the word "mother" is used in the title instead of the childish word "mom."
Crazy woman. She brought the IUD to the delivery room? Why? Was Angel waiting to jump on her as soon as she got back to her room?
These people are animals, and maybe they have to be fixed like animals...with no say in the matter.
And she has the nerve to say that she is taking care of her children...like hell. She is spending our dime. Should have been sterilized after the second
What she’s doing to her children and to the taxpayers is criminal.
One fun thing is that she will now feel the sting of the tax man with her new found wealth.
Don’t make any unnecessary purchases. Become more self-sufficient. Be more loyal to your peers, and have more kids than the elite! Defeat the population control effort!
Tubal ligations are reversible, as are vasectomies. While reprehensible on the part of the hospital, it is hardly the end-of-the-world this woman is making it out to be.
While I don’t agree with her irresponsiblity I also hate the fact that someone did this to her. This is not communist China and the government has no buisness telling people how many kids they can have.
IMHO it would be better to tell them that $X is the maximum amount of money the state gives and figure what a family of 4 would get, that alone would stop a lot of this unhindered reproduction.
I think the problem here is that the role of government has been morphed from being a very limited entity, the intended glue to hold the Union together to national problem solver and the effect this role shift has on society. The fight against this kind of encroachment is nothing new. Even Thomas Jefferson and James Madison fought it because they knew it leads straight down the road to enslavement and tyranny when we no longer take care of ourselves, but look to the government for the answer to every ill.
The position I take on this is similar to the one I took on TARP and the subsequent whining about how the CEO of BofA was treated. When one participates in socialism, one has to take the ‘good’ with the bad of it. This woman did have a choice in the matter and chose to live off public assistance, thus opening the door to the possibility of this kind of thing happening to her. If it did indeed happened to her, it was probably a citizen who dislikes the idea of what she was doing and took it upon themselves to solve it, which of course is unlawful, but I can hardly blame them.
But here is an example of exactly what happens when our Constitution becomes rather meaningless to the government, it also becomes meaningless to the public because there is no way that the ideas and expectations of individualism and self-determination embodied in that document can coexist with socialism. They are entirely different societal goals that are diametrically opposed to each other.
And really, it is up to us as a nation to make a choice regarding which road we want to follow because in the end we really cannot end up having our cake and eating it too.