If a fuel needs subsidy in order to be viable, it is not a ‘fuel’.
the bigger concern these days is the oil import bill.
anything that pulls down the oil import bill is better than the current regime.
this is the first that I’ve heard that biofuel production has been cut in half in 2009. that means that the obama goal of doubling renewable fuel output in the USA three years has no hope of succeeding.
That 2.2 billion revenue would not have been there were it not for mine and your tax dollars...
>>>If a fuel needs subsidy in order to be viable, it is not a ‘fuel’.
Does that include the ‘subsidy’ in the form of US military might to keep the free-flow of global crude oil going so we can get what we get?