Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dutch Euthanasia Deaths Up Significantly to 2,500, Number Still Underreported
Life News ^ | 1/4/10 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 01/04/2010 3:40:22 PM PST by wagglebee

Amsterdam, (LifeNews.com) -- The number of euthanasia deaths in the Netherlands rose significantly in 2009 compared with 2008. There were reportedly 200 more deaths under the law, but pro-life advocates say those numbers are likely lowball estimates given the underreporting in the Dutch system.

The Dutch News indicates approximately 2,500 people died via euthanasia in 2009, but the actual number is unknown because the government estimates about 20 percent of cases are not reported.

The new government figures also include six registered cases of euthanasia on elderly patients with senile dementia, all of whom were supposedly in the early stages and able to make their wishes to die known.

In Holland, patients wanting to be killed must be in unbearable pain, the physician must sign off on the patient making an informed choice, and a second physician must certify the doctor's findings.

Alex Schadenberg of the Canada-based Euthanasia Prevention Coalition, discussed the new numbers.

He says the number of people dying in the Netherlands is higher because assisted suicide figures are not included. If they are included, another 500 people should be added to the 2,500 who were killed last year via euthanasia.

He also says deaths without explicit consent are not included and pointed to the most recent government report from 2005 showing 550 deaths are directly and intentionally caused by the physician but not reported as euthanasia because they lacked consent.

Schadenberg also notes that, as of 2007, approximately 10% of all deaths in the Netherlands were connected to the practice of terminal sedation.

"Many of those deaths were caused by dehydration, due to the physician sedating the patient and then withholding hydration until death occurs, which usually takes 10 - 14 days," he said.

Meanwhile, the Dutch News report "acknowledged that people with dementia are dying by euthanasia in the Netherlands, but the article didn't mention how many infants died by euthanasia in 2009," he pointed out.

"The Groningen Protocol allows infants who are born with disabilities to die by euthanasia based on the request of the parents and the agreement of the physician," he said.

Schadenberg said he is "concerned that since the Netherlands does not collect information concerning the euthanasia of people with disabilities, we therefore ask the question, how many people with disabilities are coerced into death by euthanasia based on a false concept that living with a disability is a life of suffering."

American bioethicist Wesley J. Smith also commented on the new numbers.

He says he has seen studies showing as many as 50 percent of all euthanasia deaths in the Netherlands going unreported -- meaning the lowball figures Schadenberg says are higher could be higher still.

Smith says he finds it "amazing" that the "number of euthanasia deaths are under-reported because non voluntary and involuntary euthanasia don't count as euthanasia because the patient didn't consent."

"And that isn't all. As Alex notes, these statistics don't include the unduly high numbers of terminal sedation deaths–palliative sedation used not as a legitimate pain control technique but as back door euthanasia," Smith continued.

"I would also point out that Dutch doctors refer patients they don't want to euthanize with how-to-commit-suicide information," Smith added.

For Smith, "Here’s the bottom line: The Dutch prove that once euthanasia consciousness is accepted, there is ultimately no real control."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: euthanasia; moralabsolutes; netherlands; prolife
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last
For Smith, "Here’s the bottom line: The Dutch prove that once euthanasia consciousness is accepted, there is ultimately no real control."

Left unchecked euthanasia will soon become the leading cause of death in the Netherlands and it will spread from there.

1 posted on 01/04/2010 3:40:26 PM PST by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; Salvation; 8mmMauser

Pro-Life Ping


2 posted on 01/04/2010 3:41:16 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Yep, it’s a very thin line between “Right to Die” and “Duty to Die.”


3 posted on 01/04/2010 3:41:59 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; 69ConvertibleFirebird; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee or DirtyHarryY2K to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


4 posted on 01/04/2010 3:42:16 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Coming soon to a neighborhood near you.


5 posted on 01/04/2010 3:47:59 PM PST by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I suggest that Obamacare includes provisions for euthanasia. By rationing health care and substituting a pill where a (more expensive) surgery might be needed, the government weasels who will run health”care” will be euthanizing Americans soon.


6 posted on 01/04/2010 3:49:15 PM PST by EscapedDutch ("Socialism is great until you run out of other people's money" - Lady Margaret Thatcher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Not if we nuke them first.


7 posted on 01/04/2010 3:49:28 PM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

***The Dutch prove that once euthanasia consciousness is accepted, there is ultimately no real control.”***

I read, several years ago, that many old people in Holland will not call or visit a doctor when they are sick because they fear the doctor will decide on his own that the patient no longer has any “quality of life” left and will then quietly kill them.


8 posted on 01/04/2010 3:53:37 PM PST by Ruy Dias de Bivar (Are my guns loaded? Break in and find out.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
For those who doubt the inevitability of the Slippery Slope, this subject is worth intensive study. Note already how casually and without further comment the phrase "involuntary euthanasia" is used. "Involuntary euthanasia" is another term for homicide.
9 posted on 01/04/2010 4:00:18 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Funny, not many Jihadists are signing up for the “Date with 52 virgins” in Holland. Why is that?


10 posted on 01/04/2010 4:01:44 PM PST by wac3rd (Felipe Calderon supports the public option.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ruy Dias de Bivar
I read, several years ago, that many old people in Holland will not call or visit a doctor when they are sick because they fear the doctor will decide on his own that the patient no longer has any “quality of life” left and will then quietly kill them.

I sure as hell wouldn't call a doctor or even let my family know if I was ill.

11 posted on 01/04/2010 4:07:37 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I would wonder if even a majority of euthanasia cases are reported. They interviewed doctors a few years ago and found that, while there is a rather elaborate procedure they are supposed to go through, involving the patient, and the family, and some kind of hospital ethics board, in actual fact the doctors were simply acting on their own without saying boo to anyone.

If they decide you don’t have the “quality of life” you ought to have, you get the cocktail. Doesn’t matter what you’re in the hospital for. You might be in there for a couple of tests, and you don’t leave. The doctors weren’t apologetic about it at all.


12 posted on 01/04/2010 4:31:07 PM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I’m confused here. Isn’t this part a of what was so abhorrent about the Nazis? They espoused this viewpoint too, something along the line of ‘’useless eaters’’.


13 posted on 01/04/2010 4:40:24 PM PST by John-Irish ("Shame of him who thinks of it''.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: John-Irish
Yep, that's exactly what the Nazis said:

This person suffering from hereditary defects
costs the people 60,000 Reichmarks during his lifetime.
People, that is your money. Read ‘New People’.

14 posted on 01/04/2010 4:43:03 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Yes, thats it. I believe they called ‘’Daizem uner leben’’ “Existence without life’’ And we fought a war over this. Nice folks them Dutch.


15 posted on 01/04/2010 4:45:40 PM PST by John-Irish ("Shame of him who thinks of it''.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: John-Irish

For a long time after WWII many Dutch preferred to be called “Hollanders” or “Netherlanders” because the word Dutch sounds too much like Deutsch. There were over 100,000 Jews in the Netherlands at the start of World War II, less than 900 survived the Holocaust. They appear to have a VERY SHORT memory.


16 posted on 01/04/2010 4:57:25 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Good point. Short memories. Sounds like that would qualify most of’em to be taking the ‘’cocktail’’.


17 posted on 01/04/2010 5:01:27 PM PST by John-Irish ("Shame of him who thinks of it''.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Isn’t abortion a form of euthanasia?


18 posted on 01/04/2010 5:02:11 PM PST by vetvetdoug (FUBO, a fashion statement for conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vetvetdoug
Isn’t abortion a form of euthanasia?

No, the abortionists are VERY CAREFUL not to refer to abortion as euthanasia. They realize that doing so would be an admission that they are killing an actual human being. They consider abortion nothing more than the removal of a "clump of cells", much like a mole or a cyst. An abortion is a "choice" that a woman makes, just like hairstyle is a choice.

19 posted on 01/04/2010 5:07:57 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
Yep, it’s a very thin line between “Right to Die” and “Duty to Die.”

And how much easier it must to be to murder someone and have it covered up.

20 posted on 01/04/2010 5:10:58 PM PST by Bellflower (If you are left DO NOT take the mark of the beast and be damned forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson