[Repeal The 17th]

“United States vs Reynolds...
no citizen can be coerced to enter into a contract...”

-
I am trying to find this and read it.
Can you direct me?

I found two wrong ones already:
United States v. Reynolds, 345 U.S. 1 (1953), is a landmark legal case in 1953 that saw the formal recognition of State Secrets Privilege, a judicially recognized extension of presidential power.

and
Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145 (1878), was a Supreme Court of the United States case that held that religious duty was not a suitable defense to a criminal indictment.

[Sharkfish]

I think this is the one he was referring to is this one: United States v. Reynolds

[GVnana]

Your answer may lie in common law. The principle is: a contract made under duress is unenforcable.

"Conduct that has the effect of compelling another person to do what he need not otherwise do. It is a recognized defense to any act, such as a crime, Breach of Contract or Tort, all of which must be voluntary to create Liability [the sponsibility to uphold the agreement].