Posted on 01/04/2010 8:53:26 AM PST by reaganaut1
Last fall, the American Law Institute, which created the intellectual framework for the modern capital justice system almost 50 years ago, pronounced its project a failure and walked away from it.
There were other important death penalty developments last year: the number of death sentences continued to fall, Ohio switched to a single chemical for lethal injections and New Mexico repealed its death penalty entirely. But not one of them was as significant as the institutes move, which represents a tectonic shift in legal theory.
The A.L.I. is important on a lot of topics, said Franklin E. Zimring, a law professor at the University of California, Berkeley. They were absolutely singular on this topic capital punishment because they were the only intellectually respectable support for the death penalty system in the United States.
The institute is made up of about 4,000 judges, lawyers and law professors. It synthesizes and shapes the law in restatements and model codes that provide structure and coherence in a federal legal system that might otherwise consist of 50 different approaches to everything.
In 1962, as part of the Model Penal Code, the institute created the modern framework for the death penalty, one the Supreme Court largely adopted when it reinstituted capital punishment in Gregg v. Georgia in 1976. Several justices cited the standards the institute had developed as a model to be emulated by the states.
The institutes recent decision to abandon the field was a compromise. Some members had asked the institute to take a stand against the death penalty as such. That effort failed.
Instead, the institute voted in October to disavow the structure it had created in light of the current intractable institutional and structural obstacles to ensuring a minimally adequate system for administering capital punishment.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
The death penalty deters, it encourages guilty defendants to plea bargain, and it is sometimes the only punishment that fits the crime. That's my "intellectual framework".
They were absolutely singular on this topic capital punishment because they were the only intellectually respectable support for the death penalty system in the United States.
If that's the case, then it's not such good news for them to simply "disappear" on the issue...
Intellectualism. Or sophistry?
These legal intellectuals are all having conversations with each other, and believe they have reached an enlightened consensus that the death penalty is legally unsupportable.
And yet, read a message board (of any political persuasion) that posts another story about a guy who rapes and murders a nine year old girl, and the support for the death penalty for the crime is almost always unanimous...even from people who are philosophically opposed to it.
The death penalty exists for a very good reason, and will live a long a healthy life.
I prefer seeing the death penalty imposed and carried out by the would-be victim. Arm the populace and forget about court action!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.