Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The bigotry of low expectations in D.C.
Townhall ^ | 1-4-2010 | Ashley Herzog

Posted on 01/03/2010 10:35:31 PM PST by smoothsailing

The bigotry of low expectations in D.C.

Ashley Herzog

Monday, January 04, 2010

Democrats’ favorite method of shutting down debate is to accuse Republicans of secretly promoting racist agendas. Opposing socialized medicine is racist, stopping illegal immigration is racist, and—if you listen to liberal bloggers who wrote endless gasbag analyses of the incident—Rep. Joe Wilson yelling “You lie!” during President Obama’s speech on health care was racist. But forcing thousands of black kids to return to substandard public schools is apparently all good.

Two weeks ago, Democrats defunded the Washington Opportunity Scholarship Program, which serves a city that is 54 percent black and 20 percent impoverished. The high school graduation rate is 58 percent, one of the worst in the country, and in 2006, half of the public schools failed to meet basic federal education standards.

The Opportunity Scholarship Program offered poor children a quality education at half the taxpayer expense: $7,500 as opposed to the $14,000 Washington currently spends per student. In response to the Democrats’ decision, former DC councilman Kevin Chavous said, “This successful school voucher program—for D.C.’s poorest families—has allowed more than 3,300 children to attend the best schools they have ever known.”

Substandard education at twice the cost? It makes no sense—until you realize that Democrats only care about paying off greedy teachers’ unions, not quality education for poor black kids. In March, the National Education Association fired off threatening letters to members of Congress, claiming the voucher program was a “failure.” (This was an ironic accusation from a union whose members can’t get half of DC students to graduate from high school.) The NEA’s solution to failing public schools was the same as always: give teachers more money.

There is zero evidence that raising public school teachers’ salaries benefits children, let alone poor children in failing districts. Barack Obama knows this. In his book “The Audacity of Hope,” he recounts a visit to a poor, predominantly black school in Chicago. As he described it, “Their number one issue was this: Because the school district couldn't afford to keep teachers for a full day, they let out every day at 1:30 in the afternoon. There was no time for students to take science lab or foreign language classes. ‘How come we're getting shortchanged?’ they asked me.”

Here's the answer: the average teacher at the school was making $83,000 per year, and over one-quarter were making more than $100,000. They didn't think they should have to work for any less. With such exorbitant teacher salaries, it's no wonder the school couldn't “afford” to stay open.

The Democrats defunded the scholarship program over the objections of DC’s residents, 70 percent of whom support it. But what do the Democrats care? They’ve ensured that teachers’ unions will continue giving millions of dollars to their campaigns. Sasha and Malia Obama, apparently the only black children in DC entitled to a decent education, will still attend Sidwell Friends (annual tuition: $30,842). Meanwhile, public school teachers will be paid $80,000 to leave work at noon, shortchanging their already impoverished students.

Who doesn’t care about black people now?

Copyright © 2010 Salem Web Network. All Rights Reserved.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: blacks; dc

1 posted on 01/03/2010 10:35:31 PM PST by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

The bigotry of low expectiations in our elected “representatives,” if they should still be called that.


2 posted on 01/04/2010 12:30:26 AM PST by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

“But forcing thousands of black kids to return to substandard public schools is apparently all good.”

This is not an enigma. Keeping people (black or white) stupid and helpless is not isn’t “apparently” good. It literally is good. For Democrats, that is. It guarantees them a continuing Democrat voting majority.


3 posted on 01/04/2010 1:21:02 AM PST by haroldeveryman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

“...until you realize that Democrats only care about paying off greedy teachers’ unions, not quality education for poor black kids.”
The scum don’t care about “quality education” for any kids except their own. It’s harder to propagandize a population that is knowledgeable about their country’s true history.


4 posted on 01/04/2010 3:05:25 AM PST by Scotsman will be Free (11C - Indirect fire, infantry - High angle hell - We will bring you, FIRE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: haroldeveryman
Eleanor Holmes Norton,the "shadow" Representative to Congress from D.C., is adamant that vouchers should not be allowed.

She is one of the worst slavemastrson the D.C. plantation.

Also remember, highest HIV-AIDS infection total, Washington. Highest total for infant mortality, Washington, D.C.

It's a toddlin' town.

5 posted on 01/04/2010 3:35:19 AM PST by Jimmy Valentine (DemocRATS - when they speak, they lie; when they are silent, they are stealing the American Dream)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Kevin Chavous was on C-Span this weekend. He was a councilman in the District. He was also the one who wanted mandatory Pre-K for three year olds several years ago (but that’s another story). He said there were good results from these students in the program and that parents of these students were so psyched up about their children’s education that they started to go back to school to get their GEDs and in some cases, started college. I hate these self-serving bastards (and I mean bastards!) who finished this program off. They did more damage than they can possibly imagine.


6 posted on 01/04/2010 5:56:44 AM PST by goldi (')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jimmy Valentine

Furthermore, I think I remember Forbes magazine reporting that Obama himself opposed funding a charter school in D.C.


7 posted on 01/07/2010 10:16:45 PM PST by haroldeveryman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jimmy Valentine

Furthermore, I think I remember Forbes magazine reporting that Obama himself opposed funding a charter school in D.C.


8 posted on 01/07/2010 10:16:49 PM PST by haroldeveryman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson