Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Burj Dubai, the first superscraper
The Times ^ | 1/3/2010 | John Arlidge

Posted on 01/03/2010 12:49:36 AM PST by bruinbirdman

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: bruinbirdman
At least someone is reaching for the skies.

We should have built this in NYC. Instead we have a hole in the ground that serves as a monument to the complete and total capitulation of the West to the barbarians.

21 posted on 01/03/2010 4:01:35 AM PST by Caipirabob (Communists... Socialists... Democrats...Traitors... Who can tell the difference?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Is that thing ugly or what?


22 posted on 01/03/2010 4:15:41 AM PST by Rennes Templar ("Though the wrong be often strong, God still rules this earthly throng")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Rennes Templar

Babel 2?


23 posted on 01/03/2010 4:25:18 AM PST by DollyCali (Don't tell God how big your storm is...Tell the storm how big your God is!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman

Who even cares if it’s the tallest. It’s in MuzzieLand. You couldn’t pay me to take a office there.


24 posted on 01/03/2010 5:16:42 AM PST by BuffaloJack (Hoax and Chains is not the same as hope and change.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sarajevo

I remember seeing a show on a cable channel about this building, and based on that, I wouldn’t be surprised if it fell down on its own. Apparently, the Arabs do not have even the slightest concept of quality control, and the third world people they brought in to do the real work weren’t much better. The western contractors were the only people trying to do things right, and they were running ragged trying to fix all of the problems.


25 posted on 01/03/2010 5:38:38 AM PST by yawningotter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: yawningotter

I didn’t have the opportunity to see it up close, but I did see it from the airport a couple weeks ago. I can’t see this thing lasting, given the geology where it’s built. It’s all sand dune. The locals told me that the Palms and the other man-made islands are already sinking.


26 posted on 01/03/2010 6:58:07 AM PST by Sarajevo (You're jealous because the voices only talk to me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Sarajevo

The things empty? Aren’t there enough camel salesmen who need showrooms in Dubai? Who in their right mind would rent space in that area of the world? However, if you do, make sure you and your staff have stainless steel turtlenecks and flak jackets.


27 posted on 01/03/2010 7:03:22 AM PST by hal ogen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

Here I am, innocently freeping, when I come across post 14 on this thread just as my 10-year-old walks by.

Thanks for giving the whole family a good laugh - we’re still chuckling (and now my kids want to know why *I* can’t do anything that cool with my computer).


28 posted on 01/03/2010 7:03:33 AM PST by Stosh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Caipirabob
Shortly after 9/11 I read a fascinating article that dealt with the economic and engineering aspects of tall buildings. The author made the point that there's basically a near-universal limit on the practical height of a building from a purely economic perspective. He put the number somewhere around 50 floors.

The article's rationale was that once you get above a certain height, the extra costs of building each additional floor (especially the added costs of pumping water, fire protection systems, etc.) -- coupled with the loss of net floor area on the lower floors due to the need for larger building columns -- actually offset the additional lease revenue from the additional floor.

I'm sure there are some dense urban areas where commercial real estate lease rates are high enough to add some other considerations that make this general statement incorrect, but I found it fascinating nonetheless.

29 posted on 01/03/2010 7:51:36 AM PST by Alberta's Child (God is great, beer is good . . . and people are crazy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: martin_fierro; AdmSmith; Berosus; bigheadfred; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...

And, it’ll probably wind up mutilated. Thanks martin. Probably could house the entire population of United Arab Emirates. ;’) Okay, no, “4,798,491” sez the CIA WFB.


30 posted on 01/03/2010 9:25:03 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Happy New Year!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis
...2,683ft from its base to the tip of its spire — that’s more than half a mile, the equivalent of three-and-a-half Canary Wharf towers or two Empire State buildings stacked up. Its final height is being kept secret until tomorrow, but architects who have worked on the building have hinted it could break the 2,700ft mark.
Okay, now, imagine something twenty times this tall, and you're on the way to the space elevator. ;')
31 posted on 01/03/2010 9:27:04 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Happy New Year!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Berlin_Freeper

LOL!


32 posted on 01/03/2010 9:27:52 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Happy New Year!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono
Burj Dubai
Google

33 posted on 01/03/2010 9:28:51 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Happy New Year!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

And it’ll have a great view...

http://formaementis.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/burj_dubai_31108.jpg


34 posted on 01/03/2010 9:30:33 AM PST by SunkenCiv (Happy New Year!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv; bruinbirdman

35 posted on 01/03/2010 9:48:47 AM PST by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: bruinbirdman; SunkenCiv; martin_fierro
You can find much nicer building here http://villageofjoy.com/50-strange-buildings-of-the-world/

This is the first one


36 posted on 01/03/2010 10:13:02 AM PST by AdmSmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith

If you can remember the Sixties, you weren’t there.


37 posted on 01/03/2010 12:31:47 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Happy New Year!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith

Added that link to my, uh, kinda oversized links page. :’)


38 posted on 01/03/2010 12:47:27 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Happy New Year!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson