Posted on 01/02/2010 1:38:55 PM PST by wagglebee
They weren't involved. They were too involved. They weren't involved. And now we're back to them being too involved again. Okay, what was your point again?
It was you all that introduced the husbands peccadilloes. My point is they are irrelevant, no matter how much you Nanny-Staters want to bring them up.
No, that was you.
You are very slow. I will go slowly. When you marry, you give up almost all legal ties to your previous family. And if an adult leaves his/her home the legal ties to the original family become tenuous. Marriage severs them altogether.
No, Terri retained the legal right to associate with her family, even after she got married. A marriage license is not a bill of sale.
Of coure, you Nanny Staters will say anything an build any straw man to make sure you defend Big Government to support your political agenda.
You seem to have me confused with someone who supports the government's "right" to order the death of innocent citizens against their wishes.
You cant embezzle what is yours.
Terri's rehab money belonged to Terri. Her estranged husband was awarded separate funds to compensate him for his alleged loss of consortium. Aside from the fact that he obtained the award through what he later acknowledged was fraud, that part of the money was his. The money he embezzled from Terri's rehab fund was hers. If a marriage license really was a bill of sale, you might have a point, but it isn't.
The parents only started caring substantially when there was money involved.
Even Terri's estranged husband admitted that's not true.
It's no surprise that fd doesn't get that. He doesn't have the foggiest clue what science is really all about.
How much hate and evil does it take to want an innocent woman starved and dehydrated to death?
Facts are stubborn things.
The culture of death ALWAYS utilizes emotion to carry out their agenda, look at some of Hitler’s speeches sometime.
And if an adult leaves his/her home the legal ties to the original family become tenuous. Marriage severs them altogether.
Which is it? Giving up *almost all* legal ties? Or *severs them completely*?
You're talking out of both sides of your mouth.
Details, details......
>>It’s no surprise that fd doesn’t get that. He doesn’t have the foggiest clue what science is really all about.<<
Says the luddite.
God, you are an evil, hateful and very stupid shrew of a stalker.
I was pinged to this thread because I’m on the Moral Absolutes ping list.
I’m not following you around looking for your posts, hence not stalking you, for all you false assertions.
This is a public forum and since I was pinged to this thread, I’m free to post on it, and I will to defend other helpless people from liberal deathbots.
BTW, you never answered the questions about why he didn’t just divorce Terri and let her family take over her care, or whether you would like to have someone *bless* you in the same way she was *blessed*, since that’s what you consider a starvation and dehydration death.
>>This is a public forum and since I was pinged to this thread, Im free to post on it, and I will to defend other helpless people from liberal deathbots.<<
The only liberals on this thread are you Big Government Nanny Liberal Statists (shrews).
>>BTW, you never answered the questions about why he didnt just divorce Terri and let her family take over her care, or whether you would like to have someone *bless* you in the same way she was *blessed*, since thats what you consider a starvation and dehydration death.<<
He chose not to. Unlike you Nanny-state fascists, who would push your tiny-brained sensibilities on all you survey, I believe that people can decide for themselves.
As far as “starvation and dehydration” — she was unable to eat and drink. This was merely allowing nature to take its course without interruption. Of course, you Holier Than Thou Big Government types think the Holy Government you worship and kneel to should interfere as long as it supports your narrow political agenda.
You fascists are the worst of the lot. You hateful shrew ones even more so.
Leaving your spouse, moving in with another person, getting engaged to them and having children with them constitutes marital abandonment in any state in the nation.
>>The culture of death ALWAYS utilizes emotion to carry out their agenda, look at some of Hitlers speeches sometime.<<
It doesn’t take long for you fascists to wander into Godwin’s Law.
Godwin's Law is when someone compares another poster to a Nazi, that HAS NOT been done. I simply pointed out how Hitler used emotion to push death.
However, I developed "Wagglebee's Corollary" to "Godwin's Law" and that is that whenever the subject is euthanasia or eugenics, some supporter of those agendas will inevitably state something that perfectly mirrors Nazi propaganda.
You obviously misunderstand what Godwin’s Law is. Comparing forced euthanasia to forced euthanasia doesn’t qualify as Godwin’s Law.
A little piece of advice for you. You might want to familiarize yourself with your host’s views before characterizing them in such a negative light.
>>However, I developed “Wagglebee’s Corollary” to “Godwin’s Law” and that is that whenever the subject is euthanasia or eugenics, some supporter of those agendas will inevitably state something that perfectly mirrors Nazi propaganda.<<
Yes, and having Government control every aspect of a person’s life applies perfectly.
If the government has any duty to perform at all, it is protecting the lives of its citizens.
What you want is a nanny state that obeys your wishes. Apparently you wish that helpless people you want dead should be allowed to be murdered.
And then be able to call people who stand up for the helpless fascists and shrews.
You want to live in a fantasy world where people can be allowed to kill anyone who can’t fight back and defend themselves. You fail to see that you one day would be on the receiving end.
>>You obviously misunderstand what Godwins Law is. Comparing forced euthanasia to forced euthanasia doesnt qualify as Godwins Law.<<
This was not forced euthanasia, no matter how you big government fascists want to portray it as such.
TERRI WAS MURDERED (and by a whole bunch of Republicans).
Yes, I understand you prefer murderous anarchy to government, but that IS NOT a principle that the United States of America was founded upon:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men,
>>You want to live in a fantasy world where people can be allowed to kill anyone who cant fight back and defend themselves. You fail to see that you one day would be on the receiving end.<<
Schaivo told her husband what she wanted. He carried out her desires. The government should never have been involved. It is only you big government Nanny Statists who want to impose your desires over hers.
My final desires are in writing with my lawyer.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.