They weren't involved. They were too involved. They weren't involved. And now we're back to them being too involved again. Okay, what was your point again?
It was you all that introduced the husband’s peccadilloes. My point is they are irrelevant, no matter how much you Nanny-Staters want to bring them up.
No, that was you.
You are very slow. I will go slowly. When you marry, you give up almost all legal ties to your previous family. And if an adult leaves his/her home the legal ties to the original family become tenuous. Marriage severs them altogether.
No, Terri retained the legal right to associate with her family, even after she got married. A marriage license is not a bill of sale.
Of coure, you Nanny Staters will say anything an build any straw man to make sure you defend Big Government to support your political agenda.
You seem to have me confused with someone who supports the government's "right" to order the death of innocent citizens against their wishes.
You can’t embezzle what is yours.
Terri's rehab money belonged to Terri. Her estranged husband was awarded separate funds to compensate him for his alleged loss of consortium. Aside from the fact that he obtained the award through what he later acknowledged was fraud, that part of the money was his. The money he embezzled from Terri's rehab fund was hers. If a marriage license really was a bill of sale, you might have a point, but it isn't.
The parents only started “caring” substantially when there was money involved.
Even Terri's estranged husband admitted that's not true.
Details, details......
Free Republic is a pro-life, conservative web site. Anyone who comes here pushing the dogma of the death cultists don’t really belong here. There should tread carefully cuz they don’t really belong here if they’re not pro-life. They could be kicked off FR if they get carried away.