Skip to comments.
Vatican Reveals Secret Archives
Telegraph(UK) ^
| January 02nd 2010
| Nick Squires
Posted on 01/02/2010 9:42:37 AM PST by Steelfish
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
1
posted on
01/02/2010 9:42:42 AM PST
by
Steelfish
To: SunkenCiv; blam; muawiyah; decimon; sonofstrangelove; Quix
To: Steelfish
Ya have to hand it to Pope Innocent—at least HE knew who the evil guys are. Our poser is just one of them.
3
posted on
01/02/2010 9:45:38 AM PST
by
freeangel
( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like what you say))
To: Steelfish
Just read a history of the Mongols and this played an important part of that story.
Rather common occurrence throughout history. I remember reading of a King in central Africa who wanted Queen Victoria to come and bow to him.
4
posted on
01/02/2010 9:48:45 AM PST
by
Conan the Librarian
(The Best in Life is to crush my enemies, see them driven before me, and the Dewey Decimal System)
To: Steelfish
5
posted on
01/02/2010 9:48:56 AM PST
by
SonOfDarkSkies
(Al Qaeda only hijacked commercial aircraft...Obama hijacked the White House!)
To: Steelfish
And the Pope replied,
"Don't make me go Conan on you!"
6
posted on
01/02/2010 9:49:16 AM PST
by
bondserv
(God governs our universe and has seen fit to offer us a pardon. †)
To: Steelfish; Petronski; MarkBsnr; wagglebee
Just watching the clock to see how long it will take to turn this into another Catholic bashing thread......
To: Steelfish
Um...Kublai Khan was not a Muslim. The Mongols were not Muslim!
8
posted on
01/02/2010 9:51:45 AM PST
by
Tamar1973
(Freedom of the Press?! I need Freedom FROM THE PRESS!)
To: Steelfish
Wonder if it includes the papal correspondence authorizing the capture and death of the Templars?
9
posted on
01/02/2010 9:54:25 AM PST
by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 . What ever I do is what shall be)
To: Natural Law
If so, they won’t go unanswered.
To: Natural Law
If so, they won’t go unanswered.
To: All
12
posted on
01/02/2010 9:56:56 AM PST
by
BlessedBeGod
(New Wizard of Oz: Pelosi as the Wicked Witch of the West & Michelle as the Wicked Witch of the East.)
To: Steelfish
from the article:
In 1863 Jefferson Davis, the president of the Confederate States, wrote to Pope Pius IX claiming that the civil war raging across America was entirely due to Northern aggression. The article fails to mention the Vatican donated a million dollars to the Confederates.
13
posted on
01/02/2010 9:59:42 AM PST
by
aimhigh
To: Tamar1973
To: Natural Law
You got that right! 1...2...3...
15
posted on
01/02/2010 10:05:46 AM PST
by
notaliberal
(Palin supporter)
To: bert
The crystal ball says: Not likely.
16
posted on
01/02/2010 10:11:00 AM PST
by
Earthdweller
(Harvard won the election again...so what's the problem.......?)
To: Natural Law
17
posted on
01/02/2010 10:14:25 AM PST
by
Marty62
(former Marty60)
To: Tamar1973; Steelfish; freeangel
"Um...Kublai Khan was not a Muslim. The Mongols were not Muslim!" Quite true, Tamar. Not at that time, anyhow.
The turning point seems to be around 1294, when Ghazan became the first Muslim Mongol heritage to rule the Il-Khanate, and all rulers of Persia since him have been Muslim. Ghazan was Sunni, but tolerant of Shi'ites. But not of Buddhists or Christians: Ghazan destroyed and looted Christian churches, and converted all Buddhist temples to mosques. Ghazan replaced traditional Mongol law with the Sharia (Islamic code of law), and adopted Islamic military codes for the Mongol army. At Ghazan's death in 1304, virtually all Mongol elements in the Il-Khanate had been absorbed into Islamic culture.
18
posted on
01/02/2010 10:36:01 AM PST
by
Mrs. Don-o
(Mammalia Primatia Hominidae Homo sapiens. Still working on the "sapiens" part.)
To: Tamar1973
Um.. MuslimOF Mongol heritage.
19
posted on
01/02/2010 10:37:57 AM PST
by
Mrs. Don-o
(Qwerty, ergo typo.)
To: Steelfish
Khan's grandson wanted the Pope to come to Asia. It says nothing about "Muslims." My recollection is that Islam would have been 200 years old, or less-- still in its formative years.
This is a very interesting article. I just don't understand the exclamation mark in your title. Even if your addition to the title were accurate, so what? It's 750 years ago, +/-.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-51 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson