Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: GOPsterinMA

In Vanessa’s case, it could also be that was a good career move for her at the time, since she was an unknown and Feldman was a hot property in the late ‘80s. And yup, absolutely agree about tats on women, it’s gross and defacement (and ain’t something you can just remove without it leaving a scar). Megan Fox has also had some surgery in addition to those dreadful tats, so she doesn’t look nearly as good as she previously did (and she ain’t on my page, either).


84 posted on 01/01/2010 3:03:50 PM PST by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]


To: fieldmarshaldj

Good point on Vanessa.

I just hate the tats. It really is mutilation. My buddy wanted to set me up with his cousin a few years back. We went on one date, she had tats all over the place, which was too bad because she had a SMOKING, SMOKING HOT body. I’m talking 9.5/10. The tats ruined it for me. Oh and she had the toungue stud too.

What else has M. Fox had done? Nose? Chest looks real.


87 posted on 01/01/2010 3:21:10 PM PST by GOPsterinMA (Never bring a snowball to a gun fight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson