Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rcrngroup

If there is proof of this, then the custodial parent should present it to the judge. She should also file a formal complaint with the local police.

This lady decided it was a great idea to enter into this relationship. She was participating in lesbian activity in the presence of the child at one point. It’s a little tough to come before the court and complain that what you were doing, is now taking place in the home with you not there, so the child should be removed.

Look, this type of activity takes place between heterosexuals too. They do things when together that they complain about later on, like it’s going to make a big difference.

“Your honor, my wife is dating men. That’s not healthy for the child.” Good luck with that one.

Your honer, my child wets the bed and has nightmares. Okay, how do you know that is related to what is taking place at the other parent’s home?

If the seven year old can tell what is happening to child protective services, then the court will evaluate and take appropriate measures.

Absent that, it becomes a she said / she said situation, something terribly difficult for the judge to rule on.

As for one state honoring a civil ceremony in a neighboring state, isn’t that the right the lesbians were seeking everybody to honor at one point? So now they are, and Miller is unhappy about it? Too late.

Look, when Miller signed on to the lesbian civil union with Jenkins, then brought a child into the relationship, the groundwork was laid for this to become a nightmare.

I am very sorry it turned into one, but you and I both could have predicted his. And nobody would have listened if we had.

Truly a sad situation...


90 posted on 12/29/2009 11:30:28 AM PST by DoughtyOne (Good news. HC bill will not cover illegal aliens. Bad news. 20-35 million will become citizens.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne

She has presented all these facts to both the Vermont court & the Virginia court. The Vermont court ruled against her, the Virginia court ruled in favor of her, then the Vermont Supreme Court AND the Virginia Supreme Court ruled that the Vermont court decision would take precedence over all the courts. This is a complete tavesty. Evil is called good and good is called evil. I hope these homo/lesbian loving judges will roast in hell throughout eternity for destroying this 7 year old girl.


97 posted on 12/29/2009 11:38:07 AM PST by rcrngroup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson