Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Impy
Allow me to tell you. You need not to be angry about this. Kirk is DIABLO (Democrat In All But Label Only) sludge.

I'll take your word for it.

I don't know if he's fruity or not and I don't care but if the allegation that he is hurts him, super.

So the ends justify the means. Got it.

Remember now he's a democrat in the GOP and that's not an exaggeration. I'm gonna go ahead and treat him like one. He's a liberal, not a moderate.

I guess I don't think this kind of ad would be wise or appropriate against a Democrat either.

Now Andy Martin is very strange and less than a good conservative himself, I don't think he could even win an election.

He's worse than that. He's a sociopath, and I mean that. Nothing good can come from forming an alliance with him; he needs to be treated as a complete pariah.

But there are 3 credible conservatives in the race. John Arrington, Patrick Hughes, and Don Lowery. There has not been much polling so far but I'm sure more polls will be conducted. If one is clearly in a superior position to win I will vote for that candidate and urge Illinois conservatives to do the same.

That's good; hopefully one of them gains some traction. Hopefully Kirk is exposed for the DIABLO he apparently is. But this isn't the way to do it.

Think of it this way: Andy Martin = Fred Phelps.

21 posted on 12/29/2009 3:52:30 PM PST by xjcsa (Ridiculing the ridiculous since the day I was born.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: xjcsa

“One must consider the final result” is allegedly a more accurate translation of Machiavelli. That’s how the socialists think and that’s part of the reason they usually win.

Now there is no need for an “alliance” with Martin. All we need to do is sit back and watch. I wouldn’t jump to Roland Burris aid if someone alleged he packed fudge. I’d say no comment and laugh. The good GOP candidates should ignore this and focus on the issues.

BTW Martin did not invent these allegations, allegedly the democrats have been gathering info on Kirk and a decent Republican Aaron Schock who may run for higher office in the future. Schock I would defend but if he is gay it’s better it comes out sooner than later. He can say so what and that he’s against gay marriage anyway and I would gladly vote for him if he ever runs for the Senate.

You need take not take my word on Kirk. If you have a moment or 2 look up his voting record. Do a keyword search on FR. Look at his ratings from the American Conservative Union or ontheissues.org. He voted for cap and trade, he’s for partial birth abortion. He’s not worthy of defense. I only hope this gay rumor doesn’t backfire and help him win the primary.


22 posted on 12/29/2009 4:31:54 PM PST by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN | NO "INDIVIDUAL MANDATE"!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson