I provided a link to the journal paper this article is about . . . in order for the article itself to be "poorly researched," you'd have to demonstrate that it misrepresents the journal paper.
If you want to demonstrate that the journal paper is "poorly researched," you probably should take more than 20 minutes to read it before you compose your reply.
Take a look at this post "Plane Bomber Was Anti-War Activist in London":
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2417342/posts
Radical Islamists are fellow travelers with Bill Ayers, John Kerry and the Winter Soldiers, and Al Gore. Osama Bin Laden's propaganda could easily have been written by the editorial staff of the New York Times.
Further, as stated in my original post, your hero researchers who publish in the European Journal of Sociology and editorialize in New Scientist do not understand the difference between cause and effect. That's why they don't ask why radical Muslims become engineers rather than why engineers become radical Muslims.