Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: netmilsmom; sarah fan UK
Page 114-115 describes the debate in August between Murkowski, Binkley and Palin. She describes how she let them go at it then stepped in at the end as the voice of reason. She concludes by writing that it was a good night.

Then.....in a following paragraph....

Palin writes that that debate was not the last time that motherhood was a topic. She then describes another debate that occured later in the campaign. It is the section about this other debate that you quoted. It is the section about this other debate wherein she misrepresents what she said (as I wrote earlier - her real answer was better) and misrepresents that the moderator did not ask her opponents the same question. He did.

Why are you having trouble with the truth? It is what it is and adults deal with reality.

Sarahfanuk...included to close the loop.

143 posted on 12/29/2009 12:16:14 PM PST by wtc911 ("How you gonna get down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]


To: wtc911

I do see what you are looking at. I was incorrect in stating that she was in the debate with Murkowski. I understand your point and will look into it further.

However, it does make you look small when in the midst of a civil debate you, instead of reasonably pointing out that mistake, fall to...

“Why are you having trouble with the truth? It is what it is and adults deal with reality.”

Really Sir, I prefer a good hearty debate and will gladly drop out when one begins to insult rather than continue. I am an adult, I do not have a problem with the truth and do deal with reality.

However, I do not deal with smarmy posters.
Have a good day.


145 posted on 12/29/2009 12:27:17 PM PST by netmilsmom (I am Ilk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 143 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson