Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Atty Philip J. Berg defends Obama birth certificate lawsuits
Renew America ^ | December 24, 2009 | Staff

Posted on 12/27/2009 12:28:12 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last
To: 2ndDivisionVet

Lets remind those who get upset at us questioning OBOZO’S Honesty and Legitimacy, that The Senate Democrats forced McCain to PROVE that he was by definition a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN, even tho he had lived here full time and was born of two Natural Born Citizens, the Father being the Commander of the entire Pacific Fleet during the VietNam War, because they thought they could prove him ineligible because he was BORN ON A U.S. MILITARY BASE IN PANAMA while he Father was serving AMERICA!! That was OUTRAGEOUS!! But McCain stepped forward, provided all of the Documents, went thru a lengthly Senate Hearing and Proved to all of the BUTT HEADS that he WAS NATURL BORN. The SENATE still took a VOTE to finally give their stamp of Validation!! OBOZO has done everything to avoid providing anything that is Legitimate!


61 posted on 12/27/2009 6:25:17 PM PST by True Republican Patriot (May GOD Continue to BLESS Our Great President George W. Bush!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maxwellsmart_agent

AMEN...:-)


62 posted on 12/27/2009 6:28:32 PM PST by True Republican Patriot (May GOD Continue to BLESS Our Great President George W. Bush!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mlo

The Senate required McCAIN to show and defend his Birth Certificate before the SENATE! This POS wont even show a $10.50 Copy to a reporter! and the Senate is covering it up as much as the Media is.


63 posted on 12/27/2009 6:34:59 PM PST by True Republican Patriot (May GOD Continue to BLESS Our Great President George W. Bush!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

ditto and by the way who side are you on?


64 posted on 12/27/2009 6:42:47 PM PST by FreeperFlirt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Drew68
you missed the point! lets go back.. Roberts screwed up obama swearing in, why? first, because I believe Robets knew obama was a phony, second, photoshop doesn’t answers questions just raises speculations
65 posted on 12/27/2009 6:47:15 PM PST by FreeperFlirt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: MilspecRob

You can’t dodge the fact obama is spending millions to keep his hoax hidden, prove me wrong?


66 posted on 12/27/2009 6:50:11 PM PST by FreeperFlirt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: FreeperFlirt
I am among those who believe ( given the evidence) to know if Obama is natural born. We don't really even know for certain who his father is.
67 posted on 12/27/2009 7:10:18 PM PST by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: MilspecRob
So, no case law, I thought so.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Polls show that 51% of Republicans and 30% of the general population do not even believe Obama was born in the U.S.! The percentages would be higher if those with doubts were added. As Obama’s job approval drops like a stone, I expect these natural born status percentages to worsen further for Obama.

Conclusion: There is NO POSSIBLE WAY that either Republicans or Democrats can ignore Obama’s eligibility in the 2010 election. There is 3 ton dead elephant blocking the road to the voting booth. Neither party can tip toe around that big of a stinking mess!

68 posted on 12/27/2009 7:14:46 PM PST by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Frankly, it drove me nuts that Berg doesn’t seem to know the correct use of the word “to”, because he uses “too” in its place.


69 posted on 12/27/2009 7:29:31 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
Just so you know ..I think obama is hiding something, not from what I read or hear but by his actions that seems strange and what he says seems odd so I believe (even tho it seems far fetch to happen in America) that obama is playing us for fools or he really did pull a hoax like Madoff did, seems like the only two obvious choices
70 posted on 12/27/2009 7:57:05 PM PST by FreeperFlirt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: FreeperFlirt

If that’s the reason for Obama’s massive coverup, he really is stupid.

The White House is not a college fraternity and its occupant is not expected to act like a drunken frat boy engaging in practical jokes.

He would be the only one looking like a raving lunatic.


71 posted on 12/27/2009 7:59:49 PM PST by reasonisfaith (When liberal ideology is put into practice it accomplishes, universally, the opposite of its claims.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith

Then we must conclude that obama is not qualified to be POTUS under the Constitution


72 posted on 12/27/2009 8:53:26 PM PST by FreeperFlirt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet
Does anybody know where the $1 million figure, allegedly spent on litigation, comes from? I would like to confirm that - it’s an astonishing number.
73 posted on 12/27/2009 10:54:23 PM PST by americanophile (Happy New Year to all!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeperFlirt
that obama is playing us for fools
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

If that is the case, Obama is darn stoooopid!

With soldiers being shot at and killed on their own bases and planes nearly blown out of the sky, the American people will NOT be amused that he is wasting DOJ attorney time on a practical joke.

74 posted on 12/28/2009 12:24:36 AM PST by wintertime
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

No Prisoners!


75 posted on 12/28/2009 2:53:52 AM PST by roaddog727 (It's the Constitution, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa
Jamie Freeze, a law student, has called any of us who question Soetoro/Obama’s citizenship status and constitutional eligibility to serve as U.S. President — a constitutional right of ours, of course — incompetent idiots.

I doubt anyone has questioned that the Birthers have the Constitutional right to say whatever they want, so I'm not sure why that's brought up here. Of course turnabout is fair play - it's also Freeze’s Constitutional right to tell the Birthers that they're idiots.
******

Let's see:
1. President Obama signs historical healthcare bill.

2. But sometime down the road, we finally see his
Hawaii long form birth certificate and his Occidental college in California records.

3. We find out that Obama’s Hawaii long form birth certificate has no doctor name or hospital name on it.

4. We find out that Obama registered as a foreign student or as Soetoro instead of as Obama at Occidental College in California.

5. Would such information above mean that Obama’s signature on the health care bill is invalid, which, in turn, means that the Obama healhcare bill is illegal and unconstitutional?

Enquiring minds want to know.

76 posted on 12/28/2009 3:19:26 AM PST by john mirse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Everydayiwritethebook

Thank you Everydayiwritethebook.


77 posted on 12/28/2009 5:44:15 AM PST by fatima (Free Hugs Today :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: FreeperFlirt
“Roberts screwed up Obama swearing in, why?”

Because the oath of office is actually grammatically incorrect?

Because he's human and made a mistake?

78 posted on 12/28/2009 12:01:21 PM PST by El Sordo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: El Sordo

you got one out of three correct...yaaaa for you!


79 posted on 12/28/2009 12:03:37 PM PST by FreeperFlirt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: FreeperFlirt
The addition of a grandfather clause in this paragraph says a lot as to the meaning of natural born. The first thing it says is that being born in the US is not enough to be natural born, otherwise the grandfather clause would not be necessary. The writers and delegates, having been born in the US, wanted to be eligible for the presidency, but most were the children of British subjects. Knowing that that eliminated them from being natural born and, thus, from eligibility, they included the grandfather clause which expired when the last person alive at the time of the ratification of the Constitution died. So, being a native born citizen is not the same as being natural born. If it were the framers would not have included the clause.

Doesn't it make more sense to say that the reason for the grandfather clause was because there was no United States of America when they were born? It kind of hard to be a natural born citizen of a country that didn't exist when you were born, hence the grandfather clause.

80 posted on 12/28/2009 1:17:18 PM PST by Kleon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-98 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson