Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sub-Driver
Napolitano added that there was "no suggestion that [the bomber] was improperly screened."

The bomber was "properly screened" if you're Al Qeada.That's what Janet meant.

81 posted on 12/27/2009 7:00:21 AM PST by COUNTrecount (Barry...above his poi grade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: COUNTrecount

She just keeps putting her foot in her mouth and showing us how incompetent she really is.


85 posted on 12/27/2009 7:02:07 AM PST by FR_addict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

To: COUNTrecount

I hope Sarah addresses it.


92 posted on 12/27/2009 7:05:16 AM PST by txhurl (Beer for my dogs, Bourbon for me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

To: COUNTrecount
I think what she means was "the system didn't improperly violate the rights of or otherwise discriminate against the poor little terrorist"!

F*ckin unbelievable!!!

If this is true, she's more concerned about the rights of the terrorists than of U.S. citizens...right in line with Obama and Holder!

The system worked because it gave this terrorist a chance to kill us. It isn't Napolitano's problem that he was incompetent.

120 posted on 12/27/2009 7:17:25 AM PST by SonOfDarkSkies (Al Qaeda only hijacked commercial aircraft...Obama hijacked the White House!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson