Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eagle Eye

the det cord.

Now that I would think was the problem for the bomber.

IMO I think he never had the detonater set up right or connected as it should have been.
Course there would have to be more info released to know this but that’s a guess.
The amount he had would have brought down the plane and just on TV recently they showed what the amount would have done on the plane.

sounds to me AQ got an idiot at short notice or tyhe kid lost his nerve


608 posted on 12/28/2009 5:00:08 PM PST by manc (WILL OBAMA EVER GO TO CHURCH ON A SUNDAY OR WILL HE LET THE MEDIA/THE LEFT BE FOOLED FOR EVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 600 | View Replies ]


To: manc

An earlier article on Drudge (seems to be replaced now) said he had about 80 gms in a six inch container. Another article speculated he used nitroglycerin to cause the reaction.

The original article on this thread stated that the device was incendiary rather than explosive and that would be consistent with PETN that was not tightly contained. It would certainly burn hot and very fast however.

How solid was this guy with AQ? Is it possible that he was a totally disposable asset and the whole point was to see if he could get something on board then anything after that was gravy?

The tv demo you spoke of...how did they package the PETN? If packaged right it is certainly capable of blowing a hole in an airplane. If not packaged correctly it would make a fire.

Would you suppose that AQ would test such a device especially before sending one up with a novice? Could they engineer a device to be fool proof it it made it on board?


614 posted on 12/28/2009 5:40:36 PM PST by Eagle Eye (3%)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 608 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson