[publiusF27]

There's no way to know with any reasonable degree of certainty which one will and which one won't, so both fall within the regulations.

But that only becomes relevant if you can find a Supreme Court precedent saying that something that, in the aggregate, substantially affects interstate commerce can be regulated under the commerce clause, even if the activity itself is intrastate and non-commercial. Can you find such a precedent? Remember, nothing starting with a W.

[Mojave]

But that only becomes relevant if you can find a Supreme Court precedent saying that something that, in the aggregate, substantially affects interstate commerce can be regulated under the commerce clause, even if the activity itself is intrastate and non-commercial.

Sez who?

My argument stands on its own, still unrefuted. You've been unable to craft any response to it.

No wonder RP held you in such low regard.