[Mojave]

But that only becomes relevant if you can find a Supreme Court precedent saying that something that, in the aggregate, substantially affects interstate commerce can be regulated under the commerce clause, even if the activity itself is intrastate and non-commercial.

Sez who?

My argument stands on its own, still unrefuted. You've been unable to craft any response to it.

No wonder RP held you in such low regard.

[publiusF27]

Sez who?

Sez you! Your argument was only three sentences, and the first one relies on the substantial effects/aggregation test. If that's a valid test, there should be a court precedent saying so. Can you think of one? No W's now...