Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Biological catch-22 prevents induction of antibodies that block HIV
Duke University Medical Center via biologynews.net ^ | December 15, 2009 | NA

Posted on 12/24/2009 11:38:17 PM PST by neverdem

Scientists seeking to understand how to make an AIDS vaccine have found the cause of a major roadblock. It turns out that the immune system can indeed produce cells with the potential to manufacture powerful HIV-blocking antibodies – but at the same time, the immune system works equally hard to make sure these cells are eliminated before they have a chance to mature.

"These studies show that a potentially protective neutralizing antibody against a viral disease is under the control of immunological tolerance," said Barton Haynes, M.D., director of the Center for HIV/AIDS Vaccine Immunology (CHAVI) at Duke University Medical Center and senior author of the study appearing in the online early edition of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. "This represents a new insight into the way HIV effectively evades detection by the B cell arm of the immune system and may offer new directions for vaccine design."

Over the years, scientists have assumed that B cells – one of the first lines of defense against infection – are simply not able to "see" the HIV virus. HIV has the ability to hide its most vulnerable parts from immune system surveillance, and researchers generally assumed that helped explain why B cells often took weeks and even months to arise following infection.

But several years ago, Duke researchers hypothesized that the antibodies required to broadly neutralize HIV may not be produced in the first place because the immune system "sees" them as a potential threat – due to their similarity to antibodies that promote autoimmune disease – and destroys them.

To see if this is indeed what happens, Laurent Verkoczy, Ph.D., assistant professor of medicine at Duke and the lead author of the study, and Haynes genetically engineered a mouse that could only produce B cells containing a rare but potent broadly neutralizing human antibody that is able to block HIV infection.

Researchers found that the mouse's immune system produced plenty of early stage B cells bearing this human neutralizing antibody on their surface but eliminated most of them before they had a chance to fully evolve into more mature B cells capable of secreting the antibody.

"This work may mean that we need to think and act very differently in envisioning how a successful vaccine may work," said Verkoczy. "The good news is that while about 85 percent of the "right" kind of B cells are eliminated, about 15 percent survive and wind up in circulating blood, but are turned off. One goal in vaccine design may be to figure out how to wake them up so they can go to work."

"We have now unveiled a major reason why members of this class of neutralizing antibodies are not routinely made: Our own immune systems block their production because they are perceived as potentially harmful, when in reality, they are not," said Haynes. "This is a very unusual way the virus has developed to evade the immune system."

Haynes says researchers plan on using the new mouse model to test ways to teach the immune system to enable the production of powerful neutralizing antibodies capable of blocking HIV.

Source : Duke University Medical Center


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Testing
KEYWORDS: aids; hiv; hivaids; knockin
Autoreactivity in an HIV-1 broadly reactive neutralizing antibody variable region heavy chain induces immunologic tolerance

I never read about "knock-in strains" before. Correct me if I'm wrong, but "knock-in strains" are due to the creation of chimeras, i.e. human/animal hybrids.

1 posted on 12/24/2009 11:38:18 PM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I am not sure thatchimeras are a factor. All life on earth shares DNA, so every animal is a chimera.


2 posted on 12/24/2009 11:46:46 PM PST by HospiceNurse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: neverdem

Why not develop genetically engineered antibodies like they develop genetically engineered weaponized viruses


3 posted on 12/24/2009 11:48:03 PM PST by ErnstStavroBlofeld ("We will either find a way, or make one.""-Hannibal/Carthaginian Military Commander)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sonofstrangelove

One problem is that your body is apparently really honed at figuring out what belongs there and what doesn’t. The fact that we get bacterial and viral infections at all is sort of amazing. The ones that slip by the body’s defenses are really really good at what they do. Experiments have gone slowly in this genetically engineered antibodies because of the potential of severe allergic reactions to foreign or otherwise unknown agents being introduced to the body.


4 posted on 12/25/2009 12:20:55 AM PST by garbanzo (Government is not the solution to our problems. Government is the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: neverdem

It’s almost as though God doesn’t want people to commit sodomy.


6 posted on 12/25/2009 2:23:04 AM PST by Arthur McGowan (In Edward Kennedy's America, federal funding of brothels is a right, not a privilege.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #7 Removed by Moderator

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: neverdem

The big block is money. If they cure something; they aren’t making money.


9 posted on 12/25/2009 4:31:54 AM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur McGowan
It’s almost as though God doesn’t want people to commit sodomy.

Your bloodthirsty demon-god is rather careless about collateral damage. A good thing he's just a sick fantasy.

The world would be better off if people like you would become decent human beings.

Merry Christmas.

10 posted on 12/25/2009 5:47:39 AM PST by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Salman
I would rather die than to live under free Islam
اود ان يموت بدلا من العيش في ظل الحر الاسلام.

nice Arabic on your home page...

11 posted on 12/25/2009 6:50:43 AM PST by HangnJudge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Salman
It is unfortunate that you would use a thread about a fascinating article on cutting-edge research to bash those who believe in God - and on the day that we celebrate Jesus's birthday! Anatomically speaking, it is easy to see why the virus is spread most easily by anal sex. The rectum is lined with delicate epithelium that is easily torn when subjected to trauma. On the other hand, the vagina is lined with a thicker layer of epithelium that is reinforced by more muscle than is the intestinal tract. It was designed, not only for sexual intercourse, but also for delivery of babies which are much larger than a penis!

AIDS is first and foremost a behaviorally spread disease. The large majority of those who are infected (with the exception of babies born to HIV-infected mothers) belong to two groups, IV drug-users and those who engage in anal sex, or have sex with those who do. God gives us free will to choose these behaviors or reject them as unsafe.

By the way, Duke University which is in my home state, is a college that was started by, and is still partially supported by, the United Methodist Church - a group of people who believe in what you call a "sick fantasy".
12 posted on 12/25/2009 7:49:08 AM PST by srmorton (Chose Life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: HangnJudge

The Arabic on my home page is a repudiation of Islam. It could get me executed in Saudi Arabia.


13 posted on 12/25/2009 8:13:38 AM PST by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: srmorton
Your cosmic torturer who kills the innocent along with the guilty is a sick fantasy, no matter who believed it.

There is no shaming you people.

14 posted on 12/25/2009 8:15:16 AM PST by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Salman
Remember what Blaise Pascal, a 17th century French scientist and mathematician, once said - it is better to bet on the existence of God and be wrong than to do the opposite. If you believe that God exists and are wrong, then you have lost nothing. If you believe that He does not exist and are wrong, you have lost everything.

God is LOVE and LIFE. He does not kill, but allows man to have the free will to write a law which allows him to kill an innocent baby in the womb.
15 posted on 12/25/2009 9:58:42 AM PST by srmorton (Chose Life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: srmorton
The odd of it existing == 0.

The effect of pretending it's true == harmful to oneself and others.

Because you're not talking about the existence of God, but of a particular kind of horror that you call God.

Like the fellow who thinks God sent AIDS to punish sodomites without regard to innocent people getting it too.

That God cannot exist.

16 posted on 12/25/2009 11:55:33 AM PST by Salman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: freekitty; Arthur McGowan
Arthur wrote:

It’s almost as though God doesn’t want people to commit sodomy.

freekitty wrote:

The big block is money. If they cure something; they aren’t making money.

I'm almost sure there's a quip in there somewhere about "You cannot serve God *and* mammon" but I'm not sure what it is.

Cheers!

17 posted on 12/26/2009 9:45:28 AM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Salman
Since the Middle East is full of explicit theocracies, but we have Obama, the Most Merciful, instead of Sarah Palin...

Why don't you go over to Tehran or Islamabad and personally spread the good news that there is no Allah?

Cheers!

...and Merry Christmas.

18 posted on 12/26/2009 9:47:26 AM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

I think you got it.


19 posted on 12/26/2009 9:48:35 AM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Salman
You're projecting.

But the desperate fascination with God by the "atheist" is a *very* good proof of his existence, and with atheism itself as a mental disorder.

Hint: I have yet to see a single atheist buying billboards on Brit buses warning people against the dangers of Odin or Poseidon.

Nor do I see atheist missionaries going to Islamic Countries, risking death, imprisonment, and torture, to spread the good news that there is no Allah.

This despite their impassioned circle jerks on college and university grounds, saying how horrible the US theocracy led by George Bush, and threatening to spring up again under Sarah Palin, is.

Nor yet do I see worldwide charities and hospitals based UPON the enlightened Promethean understanding that the laws of Thermodynamics proclaim all life to be unavailing and ultimately meaningless and futile.

Nice try, though.

Merry Christmas.

20 posted on 12/26/2009 9:52:22 AM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson