Reads like the 10th Amendment, right?
The decisive difference being "expressly" delegated. Nothing was left to interpretation. If it wasn't expressly described, it didn't exist. There's a reason why "expressly" delegated powers were replaced with mere delegated powers in the Constitution. The federalists wanted it that way.
Distinction without a difference. Your daily hate of the Constitution is a sickness.
With what would you replace the Constitution?