Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DLfromthedesert
“I went on the GOProud website; I left a message that they couldn’t call themselves conservatives if they supported same sex marriage. Period.”

To me, conservative issues always meant low taxes, small government, 2nd amendment, strong defense and constitutional arguments (like the right to life which included the right not to be ripped out of the womb based on lifestyle desires of the mother).

When did being a conservative change to mean adhering to fundamentalist Christian doctrine?

I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just wondering when you had to subscribe to theological opinions in order to call yourself a “conservative”?

105 posted on 12/21/2009 3:26:47 PM PST by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies ]


To: Bob J

being conservative means traditional families also.

Or it is to me , my family , my friends and seems to most on this conservative site as well as Jim


108 posted on 12/21/2009 3:29:32 PM PST by manc (Marriage is between a man and a woman, end of. -end racism end affirmative action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

To: Bob J

Not a theological opinion. I know lots of gay conservatives who do not support same sex marriage. It has to do with the ordering of a healthy society which is the basis for a free society.

I think most people were tolerant of people with differing lifestyles until they became so much “in your face” wanting to teach it to children in schools, etc.

Calling names and posting those pictures are ridiculous, I agree. I’m sure the GOProud have nothing to do with the stupid gay parades flaunting their silliness.


115 posted on 12/21/2009 3:38:02 PM PST by DLfromthedesert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

To: Bob J
To 105 - Do 'conservatives' adhere to the principles of our Founders? Read the Virginia Code as revised by Thom. Jefferson, Geo. Mason, Geo. Wythe, and Edmund Pendleton. Part of Jefferson's assignation concerned the laws and penalties for homosexuals.

When did being a conservative change to mean adhering to fundamentalist Christian doctrine?

I'd say since the Declaration of American Independence and our Constitution were drawn up.

126 posted on 12/21/2009 4:05:00 PM PST by jla ("Free Republic is Palin Country" - JimRob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

To: Bob J

well stated.


155 posted on 12/21/2009 6:15:53 PM PST by TV Dinners (Hope is not a Strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

To: Bob J

When did conservative mean promoting perversion and shoving it down everyones’ throats?

PS - It’s not just Christian teachings, it’s also Hindu, Jewish, Buddhist, Jain, Sikh and every other religion. It’s basic human morality and natural law to keep homosexuality in the closet where it belongs.


168 posted on 12/21/2009 6:48:58 PM PST by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

To: Bob J

Has nothing to do with theology.

It’s natural law. It’s universal moral absolutes.

Homosexuality is a sick, depraved, unnatural, psychological sickness and moral failing. People who practice it should receive help if they want it. They should NOT be allowed to call the shots or make policy. The promotion of the “gay” agenda is meant to destroy freedom - freedom of association, freedom of speech, and freedom of religion.

The promoters of the “gay” agenda want to dominate and control our lives.

The fact that you (claim not to) don’t see this is telling in the extreme.


170 posted on 12/21/2009 6:51:38 PM PST by little jeremiah (Asato Ma Sad Gamaya Tamaso Ma Jyotir Gamaya)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

To: Bob J

It’s not just about “fundamentalist Christian doctrine”.

Homosexuality is a MENTAL DISORDER, a treatable mental disorder. It would be like paranoid schizophrenics lobbying not to take any medicine and that we should accept them as equal and forgive them the occasional murder.

Normalizing a mental disorder like homosexuality means they’re equally entitled to every benefit ascribed to normal marriage. Traditional marriage is good for a society and encouraged in many ways. Treated mentally damaged, often abused and neglected people who become homosexuals is a denial of reality. It would be if you had a kid cutting themselves, you don’t pat them on the head and say, “that’s fine honey, I respect your right to cut up your body”. Should that particular group have a CARVERPAC?

There’s a million reasons not to normalize homosexuality even before you bring religion into it, then it opens another can of worms. Force Churches to perform gay weddings or be sued?

What about lesbians?? What about chicks who experiment? What about some hetero frat boys getting married for medical benefits.

Politically, we must be opposed to normalizing homosexuality, for practical AND religious reasons.


252 posted on 12/22/2009 5:35:42 PM PST by word_warrior_bob (You can now see my amazing doggie and new puppy on my homepage!! Come say hello to Jake & Sonny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

To: Bob J
When did being a conservative change to mean adhering to fundamentalist Christian doctrine?

A better question is; When did Godless Libertarianism become the arbiter of Conservatism?

293 posted on 01/07/2010 5:08:36 PM PST by itsahoot (Each generation takes to excess, what the previous generation accepted in moderation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson