I challenge you to back up your comment.
What aspects of the Constitution do you admire?
That Madison was manipulated? He must have been an idealist. His statements and beliefs were proven wrong in practice almost immediately. I think that he had a blind spot. Meanwhile, I think there were men with more cunning, less scruples, who took advantage. Hamilton comes to mind. It was Hamilton who teamed up with Madison early on, at a convention held in Mass., and laid the groundwork for Philly. It was Hamilton who worked with Madison to get it passed. And then, as soon as Washington took office, Hamilton started to work expanding federal power. Madison was left flat-footed, like he didn't see it coming. And Hamilton won the argument.
What aspects of the Constitution do you admire?
It's difficult to think of a single thing.