Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Seven U.S. banks closed by regulators; failures at 140 (FDIC Friday) (Obamanomics alert)
Dow Jones / Market Watch ^ | 2009-12-19 | John Letzing

Posted on 12/20/2009 5:48:35 AM PST by rabscuttle385

SAN FRANCISCO (MarketWatch) -- Seven U.S. banks were closed by regulators on Friday, bring the total this year to 140 as the effects of the credit crisis continued to be felt across the country.

What's more, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. established temporary institutions to help close two of the failed banks.

(Excerpt) Read more at marketwatch.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government; US: Alabama; US: California; US: Florida; US: Georgia; US: Illinois; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: bankfailure; banking; bankinglist; fdicfriday; financelist; financialcrisis; moneylist; obamanomics

Failed Bank Information for First Federal Bank of California, F.S.B., Santa Monica, Calif.

Failed Bank Information for Imperial Capital Bank, La Jolla, Calif.

Failed Bank Information for Independent Bankers' Bank, Springfield, Ill.

Failed Bank Information for New South Federal Savings Bank, Irondale, Ala.

Failed Bank Information for Citizens State Bank, New Baltimore, Mich.

Failed Bank Information for Peoples First Community Bank, Panama City, Fl.

Failed Bank Information for RockBridge Commercial Bank, Atlanta, Ga.


FDIC Failed Bank List

1 posted on 12/20/2009 5:48:36 AM PST by rabscuttle385
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wafflehouse; Leisler; PAR35; TigerLikesRooster; AndyJackson; Thane_Banquo; nicksaunt; ...

The Money, Banking, and Financial Markets Ping List.

"Money, not morality, is the principle commerce of civilized nations."
THOMAS JEFFERSON

FR Keywords: moneylist, bankinglist, financelist

Please tag all relevant threads with the aforementioned keywords.

This can be a very high-volume ping list at times.

Ping list jointly pinged by rabscuttle385 and TigerLikesRooster.

To join the ping list:
FReepmail rabscuttle385 with the subject line add  moneylist.
(Stop getting pings by sending the subject line drop moneylist.)


2 posted on 12/20/2009 5:50:27 AM PST by rabscuttle385 (Purge the RINOs! * http://restoretheconstitution.ning.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

MSM very quiet on this one. Now...if a Republican was president, it would be above the fold, bold letters or lead story on nightly news.


3 posted on 12/20/2009 6:13:30 AM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385

Couldn’t even find a buyer for this one have to pay out directly...

The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. said it has approved a payout of insured deposits at RockBridge Commercial Bank, which was closed by Georgia bank officials on Friday.

The FDIC estimates the Atlanta, Ga. bank’s failure will cost the federal deposit insurance fund about $124.2 million.

Bank closings aren’t rare—RockBridge was the 134th federally insured bank to close this year—but the payout to depositors is unusual.

In RockBridge’s case, the FDIC said it wasn’t able to find another financial institution to take over the failed bank’s operations. As a result, it said checks to retail customers for the amount of their insured deposits will be mailed on Monday.

Brokered deposits will be wired once brokers provide the FDIC with the necessary documents to determine if any of their clients exceeded the insurance limits. The FDIC said customers who placed money with brokers should contact the brokers directly for more information about the status of their funds.

As of Sept. 30, RockBridge Commercial Bank had about $294 million in total assets and $291.7 million in total deposits. At its closing, the bank had an estimated $2.1 million in uninsured funds, an amount the FDIC said is likely to change once it obtains additional information from these customers.

The FDIC will offer a toll-free telephone hotline for bank customers with questions, at 1-800-405-1604, with service until 9 p.m. Eastern time on Friday, from 9 a.m. to 6 p.m. Eastern on Saturday and on Sunday from noon until 6 p.m. Eastern.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB126119778559798417.html

Banks in six U.S. states were closed Friday, bringing the total number of failed banks this year to 140, at a cost of over $1 billion to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Among the institutions seized by regulators was a so-called “bankers’ bank” in Illinois called Independent Bankers’ Bank (IBB), which had about 450 client banks in four U.S. states.

http://money.cnn.com/2009/12/18/news/economy/bank_failure/index.htm?eref=rss_topstories&utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed:+rss/cnn_topstories+(RSS:+Top+Stories)


4 posted on 12/20/2009 6:45:00 AM PST by FromLori (FromLori)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rabscuttle385
How do they decide whether to close a bank or bail it out? By the number of Congressmen and Treasury officials they have on the payroll. Goldman Sachs, Citibank and the rest had quite a few so the trucks of cash drive from the Treasury and Federal Reserve to the bank vaults. Podunk Savings and Loan could only afford to rent town councilmen, so they get swept away.
5 posted on 12/20/2009 6:57:30 AM PST by KarlInOhio (Gore is the fifth horseman of the apocalypse. He rides an icy horse bringing cold wherever he goes.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

Things are getting thinner here in Podunk.


6 posted on 12/20/2009 7:30:08 AM PST by AceMineral (Manos? Hands of Fate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: FromLori
Now ya got my attention!

Among the institutions seized by regulators was a so-called “bankers’ bank” in Illinois called Independent Bankers’ Bank (IBB), which had about 450 client banks in four U.S. states.

What does this mean?

Do these "Client Banks" have some kind of insurance program that exceeds the FDIC limits?

Does the FDIC insure depositors when the cash deposited in a "Client Bank" is then re-deposited in a "Bankers Bank"?

7 posted on 12/20/2009 10:04:30 AM PST by An Old Man (Use it up, Wear it out, Make it do, or Do without.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Starboard
MSM very quiet on this one. Now...if a Republican was president, it would be above the fold, bold letters or lead story on nightly news.

You're right... that's how it would be if a Republican was in office. When a dem's in office all bad economic news is - : - not covered - not covered "much" or labeled "unexpected".

8 posted on 12/20/2009 10:23:25 AM PST by GOPJ (Journalists as BaghdadBobLite - Global Warming Scientists as ElmerGantry - what's happening?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

You’re right. ‘Unexpected’ is a word whose use has come into vogue in the MSM. A sublte way of implying that the number is somehow an anomoly or departure from the norm.


9 posted on 12/20/2009 4:24:02 PM PST by Starboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: KarlInOhio

The TARP Capital Purchase Plan, core of the bailout, had criteria for banks to participate, i.e. they had to be relatively healthy before Treasury bought the preferred stock. There were obviously some exCeptions, but speCifiCs on whiCh banks had other Criteria aren’t publiC information.

FDIC’s decision to close a bank doesn’t factor whether or not its in TARP - at least it isn’t supposed to.

So far, it does appear that Treasury’s TARP screening did pick somewhat healthier banks. Of the 140 failures of FDIC insured institutions, only two were TARP banks. CIT, which declared bankruptcy, was in the Cap Purchase Program, but it wasn’t an FDIC insured bank.

With about 8000 FDIC insured banks in the country, the failure rate for those is a little over 1.5%. Over 600 institutions are/were in the Cap Purch. Plan giving a failure rate of less than 0.5%.

I read a WSJ piece on AmTrust’s failure earlier this year. AmTrust reportedly tried to get TARP money but was denied because it wasn’t considered healthy enough.

I don’t know if Treasury’s criteria for TARP participation is public information. I’d be surprised if it was.


10 posted on 12/20/2009 5:39:38 PM PST by javachip (TARP - proof there is no situation so bad that government can't make it worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
When a dem's in office all bad economic news is - : - not covered - not covered "much" or labeled "unexpected" or deemed to be George Bush's fault.

You missed one :)
11 posted on 12/20/2009 5:41:44 PM PST by javachip (TARP - proof there is no situation so bad that government can't make it worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: javachip

You’re right - good catch.


12 posted on 12/20/2009 5:49:11 PM PST by GOPJ (Journalists as BaghdadBobLite - Global Warming Scientists as ElmerGantry - what's happening?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: javachip

One TARP criteria was partially based on how much capital a bank had?


13 posted on 12/20/2009 6:00:56 PM PST by GOPJ (Journalists as BaghdadBobLite - Global Warming Scientists as ElmerGantry - what's happening?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ

Reports were the first eight banks, the big ones, weren’t given a choice, they were told to participate or else. The reason given was Treasury didn’t want taking TARP to be seen as a sign of weakness.

Beyond the big guys, the banks applied to Treasury and were accepted or rejected. I’m sure capital ratios would have been a primary consideration, but I don’t know exactly how Treasury decided who qualified for TARP and who didn’t. As far as I know, information that an applicant had been rejected was not made public by Treasury.


14 posted on 12/20/2009 8:47:13 PM PST by javachip (TARP - proof there is no situation so bad that government can't make it worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: javachip

Interesting - thanks for sharing.


15 posted on 12/21/2009 10:37:49 AM PST by GOPJ (Journalists as BaghdadBobLite - Global Warming Scientists as ElmerGantry - what's happening?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson