Skip to comments.
Criminal charge for man naked inside home
Nine News ^
| December 19, 2009
| Ninemsn staff
Posted on 12/18/2009 9:06:08 PM PST by myknowledge
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
To: myknowledge
One of Williamson's housemates testified that Williamson had been nude well before dawn. Housemate(s)? So he shares the house with others and still prances around nude in front of them? Is this a nudist colony?
To: myknowledge
Young argued that neither prong had been met.
Exhibitionist with two prongs. heh-heh heh-heh-heh heh-heh
22
posted on
12/18/2009 11:00:43 PM PST
by
UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide
(IN A SMALL TENT WE JUST STAND CLOSER! * IT'S ISLAM, STUPID! - Islam Delenda Est! - Rumble thee forth)
To: myknowledge
As she turned the corner, she looked back at the home hmmmmm
23
posted on
12/18/2009 11:04:56 PM PST
by
ditto h
To: myknowledge
Young argued that neither prong had been met.
24
posted on
12/18/2009 11:06:55 PM PST
by
ditto h
To: whatisthetruth
Williamson’s house is a ‘nudist colony’.
25
posted on
12/18/2009 11:07:41 PM PST
by
myknowledge
(F-22 Raptor: World's Largest Distributor of Sukhoi parts!)
To: Perdogg
If I were to walk by a womans house and she were Folks still learn to use the subjunctive here? I thought Americans dropped it years ago. The college board certainly did for the SAT tests. Long ago.
To: AndyJackson
Folks still learn to use the subjunctive here? I thought Americans dropped it years ago. The college board certainly did for the SAT tests. Long ago. If I were to hazard a guess, it would be that many of us were spanked by the doctor much longer ago than that.
27
posted on
12/19/2009 12:58:05 AM PST
by
ApplegateRanch
(Islam: a Satanically Transmitted Disease, spread by unprotected intimate contact with the Koranus.)
To: myknowledge
I wish that we knew more details about this entire incident; like another poster mentioned, in the original account, it was around 6 am and the naked man was getting a glass of water in the kitchen.
Frankly, I'd like to know more about the credibility of the witness. In the first story there was no teacher who drove by in a car. In the first story there was a mother starting in the door window, along with her young son.
I hope that the little boy is alright, but there are too few facts presented to make a determination ---- but in the original story it made the M-O-M out to be a kook peeping jane.
To: myknowledge
![Photobucket](http://i45.photobucket.com/albums/f92/RetSignman/womanpeekingintowindow.jpg)
"OMG, what a pervert"
29
posted on
12/19/2009 5:40:55 AM PST
by
RetSignman
(Townhalls ..."We have seen the Patriots and they are us")
To: myknowledge
Close the curtains, pervert.
30
posted on
12/19/2009 5:49:24 AM PST
by
AppyPappy
(If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
To: myknowledge; Jeremiah Jr; Slings and Arrows
![](http://images.ninemsn.com.au/resizer.aspx?url=http://news.ninemsn.com.au/img/2009/world/1912_williamson_a.jpg&width=310)
"I was on my way to answer the door. I thought they were JWs."
31
posted on
12/19/2009 6:02:42 AM PST
by
Ezekiel
(The Obama-nation began with the Inauguration of Desolation.)
To: Perdogg; Abathar; Abcdefg; Abram; Abundy; akatel; albertp; AlexandriaDuke; Alexander Rubin; ...
32
posted on
12/19/2009 6:37:14 AM PST
by
bamahead
(Few men desire liberty; most men wish only for a just master. -- Sallust)
To: Perdogg
How’m I supposed to take a shower?
33
posted on
12/19/2009 8:05:38 AM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(My Sunday Feeling is that Nothing is easy. Goes for the rest of the week too.)
To: Gabz; jan in Colorado
34
posted on
12/19/2009 8:14:06 AM PST
by
Gondring
(Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
To: Ezekiel; MeekOneGOP; Conspiracy Guy; DocRock; King Prout; Darksheare; OSHA; martin_fierro; ...
![](http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/416H5VFG30L._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-click,TopRight,35,-76_AA240_SH20_OU01_.jpg)
Criminal!
35
posted on
12/19/2009 9:04:45 AM PST
by
Slings and Arrows
("The solution to every ill is a cat." --TheOldLady)
To: ensignbay
Thank you.
Do not adopt the knee jerk FreeRepublic response to this story. there’s waaaaay more to it than meets the eye.
Like the fact that he was naked in his CAR PORT!
So okay, maybe a car port is part of a house, technically, but a guy standing naked in a car port is not quite the same as running down the hall from bath to bedroom.
He WANTED to be seen and he got charged for it through our justice system. You’ll look like the Whoopi Goldbergs who defend roman Polanski if you defend this perv.
36
posted on
12/19/2009 9:14:36 AM PST
by
Fishtalk
To: myknowledge
37
posted on
12/19/2009 9:34:41 AM PST
by
Allegra
(It doesn't matter what this tagline says...the liberals are going to call it "racist.")
To: myknowledge
“naked ... with a hard hat.”
It was the hat! HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
38
posted on
12/19/2009 9:42:32 AM PST
by
TRY ONE
(NUKE the unborn gay whales!)
To: hennie pennie; carolina71; JoeProBono
39
posted on
12/19/2009 10:17:47 AM PST
by
Daffynition
(What's all this about hellfire and Dalmatians?)
To: myknowledge
Finding this guy guilty of nudity in his own home, on the testimony of two women who were offended by his physique (or lack of) is consistent with what we've been witnessing in this country for the last several decades.
Sexual harassment accusations, which can lead to all sorts of problems for employers and employees, no longer need to be backed up with any evidence of the alleged harasser's intentions. Recent judgments instead are based solely on the victim's feelings, emotions and reaction to the alleged harassment. This has left the door open to lawsuits and complaints based on such meager evidence as "he looked at me with lust in his eye."
The same progression can be seen in "speech codes" and "non-discrimination" clauses in contracts. What was once considered dark humor is now grounds for civil--and in some cases, criminal--complaints.
I am not one to defend running around the neighborhood in the altogether, especially at this time of the year. But if a person wants to take his or her clothes off in his own home, or in his back yard for that matter, I see no reason for the law to get involved.
And if a mother and her seven-year old are offended, maybe they should look the other way. It's not like the nude guy was about to attack them.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-74 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson