Michael E. Mann
"Man behind the Hockey Stick"
referring to his reconstruction of temperatures, originally published in 1998.
My Opinion> He must be the originator of the Fraud of Global Warming.
Posted on 12/18/2009 9:46:15 AM PST by neverdem
Why does the guy in the orange jumpsuit always claim to be innocent?
Michael E. Mann
"Man behind the Hockey Stick"
referring to his reconstruction of temperatures, originally published in 1998.
My Opinion> He must be the originator of the Fraud of Global Warming.
"Fake,but accurate"
The writer of this "opinion" piece is one of the chief culprits who is complicit in pushing the great AGW hoax. He is intentionally lying in a desperate bid to cover his own rear end and prevent the whole house of cards from falling...
[[Warming and cooling are a completely natural process, Michael. None of my money is required.]]
EXACTLY and I can’t for hte life of me understand why NOONE in political positions is standing up and makign htis statement and showing hte overwhelming evidnece that proves just what you said, that cooling and warmign are entirely natural- it’s so stinkin frustrating watchign this scam unfold and not seeing anyone in power and position do the right hting to protect our liberty, our constitutional rights, and to protect us against fraud by htose in power over us.
By all rights, an intellectually honest politician (is htere such a thing) shoudl bemaking a speech at copenhagen demanding that those criminals answer for their criminal statements, answer to their deceitful manipulation of hte evidences,, and showing hte world and all those nutjob world leaders who are hell-bent on extorting money from thel ittle people the evidnec3e that proves once and for all that man is NOT to blame, and htere is NO way man should be pouring money into this collosal fraud
Lord Monkton has tried, and Inhofe has attempted to, but we need a delegation to keep declaring loudly and publically that man is NOT to blame, and that we have the proof until the maisntream media can no logner ignore the group- NO WAY shoulds this copenhagen ‘summit’ have ev3n occured concidering the fact that htere is overwhelmign evidne e that we’re not to blame, and concidering the FACT that we all know that this summit is nothing but an attempt at massive wealth redistribution that has absolutely nothing to do with climate control.
Fox has attempted to get hte word out- but my gosh- concidering the scope and magnititude of htis fraud against ALL the little folks aroudn hte world, and the devestating effect that wealth redistribution will have o neveryone- they should be hammering home the fact that this is a fraud 24 hours a day and DEMANDING that congress answer to their fraudulent claims- the ONLY things these criminals understand is force apparently, and if they think they will lose money through lawsuits and poosible imprisonment for knowingly defrauding the citizens of htis nation, this whole issue might be a compeltely different one with many moderate democrats and the GOP runnign away from the claims like it’s radioactive-
the silence of the GOP, and hte realtively small amount of reporting is enabling hte left to force through their fraud without any serious opposition
It was made -up like a Hans Christian Andersen fairy tale, except with malice.
No BS alert needed when the author is shown to be Michael E. Mann.
- Traveler
You can’t alter what doesn’t exist.
Yeah, and for decades, there were/are TENS of THOUSANDS of REAL scientists that say you're FULL OF Barbra Streisand!
I guess he just forgot to mention them.
The state media took awhile to respond to Climategate, and this is it, the spin. Though the data used to support anthropogenic global warming is faked, the warming scam is real. Got it? This will be the spiel from state media from here on, even though they don’t have one iota of proof that man made climate change is occurring.
If you the time read the comments, priceless !!!
If you the time read the comments, priceless !!!
Mann, the guy who had to retract his faked “hockey stick” chart, the one that was used by Warmists to “prove” the need for global political change, is telling us that his buddies who helped him, didn’t help him concoct his fraudulent graph.
Hey professor, where did the Medieval Warm period go in your graph? The Maunder Minimum? You and your unindicted co-conspirators thought you could make a better case for catastrophic warming now if we, the unwashed, did not know that Earth was two degrees warmer than now, immediately followed by a full degree colder than now, all without Gulfstream jets and Chinese coal plants!
“I’ll give him credit for being bold.”
A bunch of these guys are very bold and in-your-face. Nobody is allowed to talk back, though, so these gradeschool bullies can swagger around at will.
“Hey, where is the BS alert?”
“It’s in the byline: ‘Michael E. Mann’ = ‘100 percent pure B.S.’ “
Very true and duly noted. I have added appropriate keywords to this thread.
Typical lying distortion from the worlds only source of "Mann" made global warming. The DATA did not end in 1980, the plot did. The problem was the inconvenient fact that the data AFTER 1980 did not show what Mann wanted to show, so he simply left it off the graph. Had he left it on, the plot would not have been nearly as convincing as the one he plotted. It would also have proved that the remaining data was suspect. Neat "trick". I would call it deception.
Typical lying distortion from the worlds only source of "Mann" made global warming. The DATA did not end in 1980, the plot did. The problem was the inconvenient fact that the data AFTER 1980 did not show what Mann wanted to show, so he simply left it off the graph. Had he left it on, the plot would not have been nearly as convincing as the one he plotted. It would also have proved that the remaining data was suspect. Neat "trick". I would call it deception.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
