“No need to say where we’d be should there not be the internet or sites such as this.”
So true, so true. And that’s why the zero administration wants to control it. Just think about the enormity of the administration’s plan for the American populace. The internet must be by far the hugest thorn in their side. And they so want to pass the deathcare before Christmas while people are busy with their Christmas plans. They don’t want congress going home for the holidays and hearing from constituents BEFORE they get their vote. The internet and the tea parties are definitely getting in their way.
This is a huge battle going on, just huge. It’s the biggest thing in fifty years and the whole climate scam is hot on its heels. So far, it’s been peaceful. It may not remain peaceful. It’s up to us to keep up the pressure, heavy pressure, and we need to start finding ways to outsmart their efforts to avoid us. They’re desperate - so desperate they’re willing to lose their legislative control to get it.
On that we dis-agree.
I've said/questioned whether Öbama wants a second term. Why should he?
If he gets ANYTHING through for health care, it will be something for his legacy (he is a narcissist after all, much more so than the Clintons) Why else would he put time limits on passage of the bill?
If he (or any legislator) cared about the true intent of the bill, they'd expend the time to get it right or minimally to the agreement of the country and the media. (the media... the media is now questioning it... hmmmmmmm, why?)
The Clintons started this (in our limited political time span of knowledge/remembrance).
To date, no more have died or been denied HEALTH CARE than before have they? (couldn't have, the government or media haven't reported such).
It's a friggen insurance bill scam and a NAMING Right, GLORY bill for all involved.... including all Republicans who allowed it to get this far.
reply/comment/rant off
I agree up to where you think that they will give up their legislative control. Perhaps they will not need to control any further than they have?
Control from behind the light of the minor press exposure that they now receive (and the current turning against them by the 'press') would be more to their liking (or anyones).
It's reminiscent of the earlier days of control/political 'persuasion' by those who owned newspapers.