Posted on 12/17/2009 1:02:06 PM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach
"Climategate" has put scientists on trial in the court of public opinion. If you believe climate sceptics, a huge body of evidence involving the work of tens of thousands of scientists over more than a century should be thrown out on the basis of the alleged misconduct of a handful of researchers, even though nothing in the hacked emails has been shown to undermine any of the scientific conclusions.
If we are going to judge the truth of claims on the behaviour of those making them, it seems only fair to look at the behaviour of a few of those questioning the scientific consensus. There are many similar examples we did not include. We leave readers to draw their own conclusions about who to trust.
(Excerpt) Read more at newscientist.com ...
Starting with this from the JoNva website in Australia, the locale of the most deliberate modification of climate date.
***************************EXCERPT************************
http://joannenova.com.au/2009/12/new-scientist-becomes-non-scientist/
******************************
You might think journalists at a popular science magazine would be able to investigate and reason.
In DenierGate, watch New Scientist closely, as they do the unthinkable and try to defend gross scientific malpractice by saying its OK because other people did other things a little bit wrong, that were not related, and a long time ago. Move along ladies and gentlemen, theres nothing to see
The big problem for this formerly good publication is that they have decided already what the answer is to any question on climate-change (and the answer could be warm or cold but its always ALARMING). That leaves them clutching for sand-bags to prop up their position as the king-tide sweeps away any journalistic credibility they might have had.
Ive added my own helpful notes into the New Scientist article, just so you get the full picture.
***********************************
The above from the JoNova website.
fyi
A hundred years ago the study of eugenics and somatyping was used to defend forced sterilization in the US and the holocaust in Germany.
Based on concentrations (ppb) adjusted for heat retention characteristics | % of Greenhouse Effect |
|
|
Water vapor | 95.000% |
94.999% |
0.001% |
Carbon Dioxide (CO2) | 3.618% |
3.502% |
0.117% |
Methane (CH4) | 0.360% |
0.294% |
0.066% |
Nitrous Oxide (N2O) | 0.950% |
0.903% |
0.047% |
Misc. gases ( CFC's, etc.) | 0.072% |
0.025% |
0.047% |
Total | 100.00% |
99.72 |
0.28% |
I know there are trillions of dollars at stake and I know the climatologists are very aware of what the grant givers want to see.
The Evolution of the Global Temperature Record ( Skullduggery with Darwin, Australia records)
And the Graphic:
For basic physics, New Scientist is great.
For anything else, it’s TIME of Britain.
I know - I started reading it whilst a student at Oxford and subscribed for years. Dropped it a couple of years ago because their “science” reached “progressive idiocy” levels.
It isn’t 10s of Thousands, only 50 or so scientists have been spinning the research of global destruction warming.
Why redistribute trillions from the US to the Third World if the goal is just to reduce global carbon production? Why permit China and India to ramp up carbon byproduct?
Force everyone to new technologies and don’t use Marxist plans to funnel money to third world despots.
I guess their starting to feel some heat.
Evidence thown out? No, we should just restart with the original weather measurements because the methodology is in question... now if we can just find the landfill all the original raw data was dumped into.
So we can expose it!
Citing the E-mails is the fallback position for the defenders of those scientists. However, the real story lies in the rest of that data, namely the programs used to manipulate the data. That’s far more damning than the E-mails. Also, I haven’t seen the other institutions that supply the IPCC with data stepping up to reveal that East Anglia is an outlier and the data presented by them will correct the record. We’re waiting.
fyi
You know, Sometimes the facts get in the way of the truth...
See the updates above.
The Green Mask Is Being Peeled Away From The CO²mmunists All Eyes Now On Copenhagen
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.