Posted on 12/16/2009 5:35:25 AM PST by reaganaut1
Global warming warmongers insist that the recently exposed "Climategate" emails, exchanged among climate scientists working for the UN's Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), do not change the basic science underlying global warming, so they are no big deal. But they are quite wrong. The data and the arguments now discredited by the corruption exposed in the emails leaves the scientific case against the idea of man-caused global warming overwhelming at this point.
The Warmongers you see on television claiming a well-established scientific consensus in favor of man-caused global warming are pretending, or play-acting, for the purpose of misleading you. Quite to the contrary, the scientific argument for man-caused global warming was thoroughly demolished earlier this year with the release of the 880-page study, Climate Change Reconsidered, authored by the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC). The response to that study can be taken as an admission by global warming advocates that they cannot defend their position in debate.
Instead, what we hear from the Warmongers is a steady stream of name-calling ("deniers"), and, unfortunately, outright lies, as shown further below. Now exposed as well is the dishonest manipulation of basic data.
In sharp contrast, first rate, blue chip scientists are increasingly concluding that humans have little effect on global temperatures, and that natural causes and temperature patterns continue to dominate. [...]
Indeed, as will be shown below, as a result of the work of these scientists, we now have scientific proof that the notion of significant man-caused global warming is false.
(Excerpt) Read more at spectator.org ...
global warming ping
Bump
The most damning summary yet of the “warmongers” deceit.
Gore belongs in jail.
Where does that leave us? We know the aforementioned are all bullshiite, but our elected representatives are taking our money on the pretext they are all true.
Voter fraud alone cannot explain this, although it is certainly a potent phenomenon. The only cogent explanation is, that of those who actually SHOW UP TO LEGALLY VOTE, (i.e., about half of those who are eligible,) more than half their number are invincibly ignorant.
If the other half of the eligible voters turns up at the polls, can we salvage this situation?
bttt
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.