[freedumb2003]

>>Your first post is #4. It was in reaction to my point that the teacher needs to be sent to sensitivity and anger management classes.

You then stated that it wasn’t about freedom of religion.

Up to that point I said nothing about religion. My take was that the teacher was either in heat, or in PMS, or maybe both simultaneously, and needed serious counseling.<<

Yep — I really meant to respond to the OP because the direction of the article suggested this was a result of Christian bashing. I must have clicked on yours instead.

We have wasted all this thread trading clever biting repartee when I wasn’t intending to respond to you at all! LOL!! I don’t blame you flaming up a bit, but a simple “HUH?” to my #4 might have saved us both many electrons (not that it is your job to police my posts).

>>My side the discussion was decidedly secular until you busted in with your misconstrued “Jesus stuff”. Now what the heck kind of Atheist are you to be running around imagining Jesus all the time. You should be checked out by competent authority somewhere. <<

If there is a competent authority that can help me click on the correct link, bottle it and sell it! (but of course FR would shrink to 1/3 its size). :)

But FWIIW, I was going to ask you what anger and sensitivity issues you see. So you can take that on now, should you be inclined.

[muawiyah]

I don't need no steenking classes (pulls other poster's head close, butts it, knees face as other poster falls backwards, and then proceeds in a close imitation of latest anime cartoon to finish the job. Performs tebagging ceremony in victory dance.)

This is why you gotta' make sure you are posting to the right people; else strange things could happen.