Lamh Foistenach Abu!
Posted on 12/14/2009 6:32:09 PM PST by reaganaut1
Last week's federal report card on math achievement was a welcome piece of good news for D.C. public schools. Although the District still lags far behind the country's top-performing systems, the report card showed fourth- and eighth-graders making strides at a faster pace over the past two years than cities including Atlanta, Chicago and New York.
But what remains embedded in the latest numbers from the National Assessment of Educational Progress is the persistent achievement gap between African American and white students both locally and nationally. The average scores of white D.C. fourth-graders over the past two years grew from 262 to 270 (on a scale of 500), but their African American peers' rose just three points, from 209 to 212. The achievement gap actually grew between 2007 and 2009, from 53 to 58 points.
African American progress in the eighth grade remained essentially flat, dipping a statistically insignificant one point, from 245 to 244. Average white scores were not included in the test results because the sample size wasn't large enough.
The picture across a six-year stretch isn't more encouraging. The gap separating white and black fourth-graders in 2003, when the first NAEP in the District was given, was 60 scale points (262 to 202). Although the scores achieved by children in both groups have increased during this period, the difference has barely narrowed to 58.
Some education advocates in the District expressed concern last week that the gains celebrated by Chancellor Michelle A. Rhee and Mayor Adrian M. Fenty (D) were propelled largely by white students who are already high achievers.
"It would suggest that we've raised the aggregate by treating those at the higher end of the scale, which is problematic and troublesome," said Jeff Smith, executive director of D.C. Voice
(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...
Lamh Foistenach Abu!
I wonder what will happen when robots can do the work of most students getting Cs or worse.
It isn’t going to be long.
They dare not say the truth:
Black culture eschews education. It is called “acting White.”
Hispanic culture eschews education. It is called “belittling your Papa (by surpassing him).”
For the most part, the cultural norms of Whites and Asians want kids to learn and do better than their parents.
This is just fact. It is like falling on the ground and then blaming gravity for picking on you.
>>I wonder what will happen when robots can do the work of most students getting Cs or worse.<<
It is happening now. They are called “Indian and Chinese Application Developers (programmers).”
Mathematics are rigid, doctrinate and dogmatic; there are only correct answers, and incorrect answers, and that is insensitive. It is unfair that solving mathematical problems requires knowledge, and that acquiring knowledge requires self-discipline. This is RACIST!
Either the tests discriminate or the 2 plus 2 result is different for the various races.
Its always the same: We can’t explain the gap in achievement. What do we do now? Their answer: Throw more money at the problem. HEY, Morons...That obviously doesn’t work. The Bell Curve book explains the problem (as does the disturbed families of some, the cultural norm against achievement and so forth). Wake up, people. You don’t need more studies or more money.
Lamh Foistenach Abu!
Blacks have been told, by so-called black leaders and politicians, that they are victims and helpless and thats the way they act. Yet they continue to listen to and vote the same “plantation owners” all the time. It is hard to have sympathy.
No amount of money/time/incentives will help when someone does not want to get an education.
This gap seems very small and I don’t think it’s fair to extrapolate anything from it. I am sure many will use this to demand more money when money is not the problem no matter what race the student is.
Parents are most responsible for scholastic achievement at these age levels.
Yes, it’s not color - it is culture. Culture is a much more stubborn, insidious problem, imho.
Hi Detroit!
Hi Chicago!
Hi New Orleans!
Hi Saint Lewis!
...how's that liberal bullsh*t working for you...?
I am summarizing from all the studies that have been published for probably the last 40 years or so.
Parents are most responsible for scholastic achievement at these age levels.
Somewhere between 40 and 50% of all blacks are born into a "family" with no father (some links: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/16/AR2006121600998.html, http://www.jbhe.com/vital/53_index.html.
The single parent (almost always the mother) is in no position to monitor the child's education. The street culture rules, and "acting white" (succeeding academically) is not tolerated.
Not sure where you live, but in the real USA, these are facts, not opinions.
It’s impossible not to have sympathy for these young children who have all the potential but lack the environment and mentors to succeed.
I agree with you about the race hustlers who use race to divide and gain power.
I wish the media gave more attention to young people when it comes to race. They are far more ahead of the media curve no matter how much Jackson/Sharpton/Obama and their ilk want to keep it alive.
You hit the nail square on the head: it’s a cultural thing not a race/ethnicity thing.
Affirmative Action demands that 2 + 2 = 22.
They used to claim it was racism, but now IQ testing is standardized and can be done accurately. What they've found is that blacks are, on average, slightly less intelligent than whites. This is the reason they now seek quotas for jobs and college admittance.
However, they can't admit this. The reason the book created such a controversy was NOT because the ivory tower types thought it was false. It was because they knew it to be true.
I remember CBS (Dan Rather was still there) doing a hit piece on the book and they had this kid on there saying he could be anything he wanted and the book didn't mean anything. This kid couldn't have spelled cat if you spotted him the C and the A and there's no way he'd read the book.
There's a lot of interesting information in the book on intelligence stratification and lower IQ types reproducing more than intelligent people. It's a scary book because a lot of the information sounds like what was coming out of the eugenics movement, but also because it's documented and they make some strong arguments.
When I was taking pre-engineering courses twenty years ago, my friends of Asian decent were victims of reverse discrimination when trying to get into certain engineering programs because statistically they did far better in math than students of other ethnic groups including Caucasians. There simply were too many of them getting into top engineering schools. Did it have anything to do with my friends coming from families where discipline and hard work were stressed as the best way to get ahead, or as a group were they genetically better at math?
The actual numbers never support the sacred leftist viewpoint that persons of every ethnic group have the same innate abilities and should achieve the same results in every scholastic endeavor. If they don’t discrimination gets the blame for any discrepancy in the numbers. Well guess what? Common sense says not that all ethnic groups are created the same. Recognizing this easily provable observation is blasphemy against the liberal leftist religion. You will be branded with a big red R on your forehead.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.