Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kalee; P-Marlowe
Because our insurance refused to cover much of it due to semantics

This sounds like the insurance company was using a legal dodge to keep from paying. You said, "semantics"...the words of the contract?

It sounds like the insurance company SHOULD have paid.

It sounds like the Salvation Army lawyer knew that.

It sounds like the Salvation Army lawyer got the insurance company to pay, the thing you've agreed that the insurance company was supposed to do in the first place.

The SA attorney was a shark. I will never give them any money

Do you still pay the insurance company?

233 posted on 12/14/2009 11:59:47 PM PST by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who support our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

I had insurance which in the end paid the bill, but only after the State Ins Commissioner got involved. The lawyer was not after the Inc Co., she was after us and many of the threats she made were illegal and proven to be so.
Do I still have that Ins Co? No way!
As for the SA we did not want charity in the sense of a freebie, but we did need charity in the sense of kindness and grace, neither of which we received from the supposed charitable institution.


236 posted on 12/15/2009 2:11:06 AM PST by kalee (01/20/13 The end of an error.... Obama even worse than Carter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson