To: Para-Ord.45; Darnright; According2RecentPollsAirIsGood; livius; DollyCali; FrPR; ...
2 posted on
12/14/2009 10:16:10 AM PST by
steelyourfaith
(Time to prosecute Al Gore now that fellow scam artist Bernie Madoff is in stir.)
To: Para-Ord.45
The process is so flawed that the result is tantamount to fraud. As an authority, the IPCC should be consigned to the scrapheap without delay.
3 posted on
12/14/2009 10:18:14 AM PST by
CedarDave
(FOX news:"Fair and balanced (no matter what the White House says) . We report because others won't.")
To: Para-Ord.45; holdonnow
There are two problems, however. In the scientific world I move in, “review” means that your work is scrutinised by several independent, anonymous reviewers chosen by the editor.
However, when I entered the IPCC world, the reviewers were there at the worktable. ...The product was not reviewed in the accepted sense of the word — there was no independence of review, and the reviewers were anything but anonymous. The result is not scientific.
4 posted on
12/14/2009 10:20:35 AM PST by
CedarDave
(FOX news:"Fair and balanced (no matter what the White House says) . We report because others won't.")
To: Para-Ord.45
The process is so flawed that the result is tantamount to fraud. Duh?
5 posted on
12/14/2009 10:23:16 AM PST by
HerrBlucher
(Jail Al Gore and the Climate Frauds!)
To: aflaak
6 posted on
12/14/2009 11:45:15 AM PST by
r-q-tek86
(It isn't settled because it isn't science)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
