Posted on 12/14/2009 2:58:11 AM PST by Clive
PARIS - French investigators are unlikely to establish the exact cause of a fatal Atlantic plane crash in a report this week but may recommend ways to help locate black boxes more easily, sources familiar with the incident said.
France's BEA accident investigation authority is due on Thursday to issue its final report into the Air France crash in which 228 people died.
Flight AF 447 from Rio de Janeiro to Paris crashed into the Atlantic on June 1 after flying into stormy weather.
The ‘black box' flight recorders remain missing and only small parts of the wreckage have been found of the Airbus A330.
"I don't expect much new concrete information on the cause of the crash," a source familiar with the investigation said.
A second source familiar with the incident concurred, saying the report would add little to an inconclusive preliminary report issued in July.
The new report's conclusions are currently being finalised, the sources added.
The BEA declined to comment.
The July report identified problems in handing responsibility for the aircraft between controllers but said it was too early to say what caused the plane to hit the ocean.
Speculation has focused on possible icing of the aircraft's speed sensors, which appeared to give inconsistent readings and may have disrupted other systems.
Safety authorities ordered checks on the sensors known as ‘pitot probes' and restricted the use of the type installed on the plane, made by France's Thales.
But investigators are not expected to pin the blame on any one issue, one source close to the investigation said.
Instead, the BEA is expected to make at least three recommendations on general aircraft safety, this source said.
These include extending the life of locator beacons attached to the flight recorders to 90 days from 30 days.
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalpost.com ...
THAT, it seems to me, to be the mystery .. not a missing black box.
Who or what was on that plane?
More likely than not, it broke up and the pieces sank.
Trying to find those pieces at the depths comparable, if not deeper than, say, the Titanic, is a monumental task, especially since the beacons attached to the Flight Data Recorder and Cockpit Voice Recorder devices have a set lifetime, and that's assuming they weren't damaged on impact.
Yup, what was on the plane is probably the best answer.
Yup, what was on the plane is probably the best answer.
Or who, or both. I would love to know how much scrutiny the passenger list received. Of course if a bomber, he/she wouldn’t necessarily have to have been aboard.
aeroping
Yup, what was on the plane is probably the best answer.
.....
Who and what...
Come on, the official answer was ‘lightning’. Scratch that.
Next, the official answer was ‘defective pitot tubes’. Scratch that.
Do you really expect France to blame Air France or one of their countries produced aircraft for a mechanical failure?
Correct. . .especially since they are in a bidding war for the next USAF tanker.
Ping
thanks. says bea to issue report thursday which will say nothing new...
Reason Number 1: The aircraft involved was a POS.
No Air France for me today, thanks.
My first guess would be they flew into an area of thunderstorms that was more than most any aircraft can handle. Add to that ANY malfunction of the systems on board and you don’t need a bomb. And then add to that the failure of a single flight control surface or structural piece of the aircraft and it spells certain doom.
To make matters even more interesting, CNN reports another AirFrance incident of severe turbulence in nearly the same spot as the flight 447 crash area, this time, on 11/29.
http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/europe/12/11/air.france.investigation/index.html
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.