But today it is clear (there are solid links) that killing of animals who cant protect themselves is a pathological trait. It almost inevitably leads to the same treatment of humans.
That includes hunters and butchers. You are wrong here, “Free” “Dumb.”
Your first link gives no statistics on any of this—it’s all pop psychology, which obviously is wrong if hunters and butchers don’t kill people.
Then you post a link to a place that, according to Google, only supports liberal causes:
http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q=change.org
But I guess a person that supports “Jobs for Change,” “Gay Rights,” “Middle East Peace,” “Animal Rights,” “Ending Homelessness,” and “Global Warming” from a liberal perspective fits you.
I know your kind. Conservative “emptymind”
You torture small animals for your own pleasure, then say “it’s not like it was real — it was just a cat/dog/child/whatever.”
I can see you in your basement now — is it the neighbor’s cat who dares to caterwaul because that is what makes him do so? Or maybe the puppy across the fence who kept you up last night?
Either way, your evil eye makes no distinction. It is just fur and flesh. Kill it? Who cares? Does she or he mean anything to anyone? Not an issue.
Your justification of torture to animals says all to those who know your type. And your type have been known throughout history.
http://www.google.com/#hl=en&source=hp&q=change.org
But I guess a person that supports “Jobs for Change,” “Gay Rights,” “Middle East Peace,” “Animal Rights,” “Ending Homelessness,” and “Global Warming” from a liberal perspective fits you.
No, I just got whatever information was concrete about the link between animal cruelty and serial killers, that's all. I did not care about the actual content of the website. I'm not supporting any liberal ideology in any way, that is anathema to the conservative ideals espoused by FR.