Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: muawiyah
I am getting at nothing. You said you wanted to get Fundmentalism "inside the pale" of science. What do you mean. Seems to me what I read here is not compatible.
386 posted on 12/11/2009 8:21:10 PM PST by CaptRon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 380 | View Replies ]


To: CaptRon
The pale of Christian orthodoxy ~ science is in there, fundamentalism is in there ~ what is not necessarily in there is the Leftwingtard definition that limits "Fundamentalism" to a certain group that got exceedingly involved in the Scopes trial.

I think you are trying to draw a barrier between Christianity, particularly what you you think of as "fundamentalism" and science.

It's not there.

Free speech always works out well, and after Climategate I'm somewhat afraid too many of our supposed "scientists" are more busy keeping us from discovering their arm bands than in doing real science.

You should fear scientists and politicians who share an agenda of suppressing truth

397 posted on 12/11/2009 8:30:15 PM PST by muawiyah (Git Out The Way)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 386 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson