Again, I don't let the opposition own the words, and that includes opposition owned or controlled dictionaries. They are still on their kick of isolating the term "Fundamentalism" to the anti-evolution crowd that got involved in the Scopes trial nearly a century ago. I, on the other hand, want the term recognized to be more broadly inclusive of all within the pale of Christian tradition, or Judeo-Christian theological tradition.
Whoever the Scopes people were is simply not relevant here.
Well, “beyond the pale” of that tradition, is there no room for science?
Catholics do not consider themselves fundamental christians nor do fundamental Christians consider Catholics FCs. In fact fundamental Christians spend of lot of time telling you what’s wrong with catholicism.