Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Phileleutherus Franciscus

Well, they would be a different species within the animal classification I’d assume (regarding the big cat).

But say a poodle and a cocker spaniel breed, that new breed within the dog species doesn’t make them a wolf, right?

I promise, I am not being argumentative or intentionally obtuse, but these are questions I’ve never had answered really and I start to think maybe it IS me. Maybe I am just too dull to grasp it. And then that leaves me to ‘leaving it to the scientists’, but it still doesn’t answer my basic questions that nag. I mostly leave this subject alone to ‘I just have NO IDEA’ until the subject comes up. As it has now.


316 posted on 12/11/2009 7:40:11 PM PST by autumnraine (You can't fix stupid, but you can vote it out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies ]


To: autumnraine

They’d be a mutt with attributes of each. But the offspring would be able to breed with another dog so they are the same species.


346 posted on 12/11/2009 7:51:41 PM PST by CaptRon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies ]

To: autumnraine
Well, they would be a different species within the animal classification I’d assume (regarding the big cat).

But say a poodle and a cocker spaniel breed, that new breed within the dog species doesn’t make them a wolf, right?


All of the cat species, from the house cat to the jaguar to the tiger, in the New World and the Old World, were once the same animal (whether you accept Creation of "kinds" or evolution), yet there are huge differences among them now. If you put a group of chihuahuas in a different environment (islands are classic) where, perhaps, the primary easily accessible food was grain, how long would it take before the descendants of the chihuahuas were indistinguishable from rats? (Assuming you can tell the difference now :D)
347 posted on 12/11/2009 7:51:44 PM PST by Phileleutherus Franciscus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies ]

To: autumnraine
Maybe I am just too dull to grasp it. And then that leaves me to ‘leaving it to the scientists’,

If your instinct tells you that that it's all Politics with a capital P behind much of biological science, then your instincts are correct. Just as Phil Jones and Michael Mann have corrupted "climate science" (whatever the heck that means) by their own greed, vanity, and ideology, so too do biological scientists seek self-aggrandizement over humble scientific inquiry.

Just remember the word "species" is quite malleable, especially by those on the Left. My personal opinion is that the word is being corrupted for political gain. After all, if we can split the western flycatcher into 2 suboscine species that are virtually identical -- the Cordilleran and the pacific-slope -- then in a roundabout way, we've "proven" the exigency and expedition of evolution in action, haven't we?

They took the word "gay," and corrupted it. They're trying to take the word "marriage" and corrupt it. Tomorrow, it will be the word "species."

Yes, appalling.

368 posted on 12/11/2009 8:01:49 PM PST by Flycatcher (God speaks to us, through the supernal lightness of birds, in a special type of poetry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies ]

To: autumnraine

It is not you.


378 posted on 12/11/2009 8:12:42 PM PST by Freedom'sWorthIt (Obamacare + Obama's EPA + Demobama Dectruction of economy = many will die unnecessarily)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson