[FreeReign]

The Theory of Evolution states that there WAS no one man, but a wide population that managed to inherit that last mutated gene that makes MEN different from APES.

Actually not. The theory of evolution does revolve around single common ancestry, so you example doesn't make your point. And BTW, just because one believes, that the scientific evidence suggests, that changes occur in the genetic material of organism populations through successive generations, doesn't mean that one is specifically talking about the supposed evolution of man, from apes.

Look I have no real interest in trying to convince you about evolution, but understand I will defend my beliefs when they are incorrectly criticized.

Take it or leave it.

[presently no screen name]

doesn't mean that one is specifically talking about the supposed evolution of man, from apes.

What is it about evolution - do you have a chart and pick and choose what part of the pie you want? Evo's have denominations, I see. Are you a Class A believer or Class D.

Look I have no real interest in trying to convince you about evolution, but understand I will defend my beliefs when they are incorrectly criticized

WOW! A religious zealot! Go for it.

[Elsie]

Look I have no real interest in trying to convince you about evolution, but understand I will defend my beliefs when they are incorrectly criticized.

I understand your position. At least you recognize they are BELIEFs and not FACTS.

If Evolution were true, then, in all of these stable populations we see around us, there'd be various things that are not needed for the present specie to continue to exist, but are found anyway. IF that new characteristic is to be continued onward into the next generation, would it NOT have started with one individual?

[Elsie]

The theory of evolution does revolve around single common ancestry, so you example doesn't make your point.

Then what DOES it revolve around?