“As I said, there seems to be a bit of confustion as to what to call these specimins. “
They are called “Fossils”
“But “organically preserved” muscle tissue, complete with blood vessels infilled with blood, is not what is traditionally understood as “fossilized.””
Is that why they still call them “fossils”?
“Unfortunately, no matter how many times you pull your head out, the soft-tissue will still be organically preserved soft tissue.”
They will still be fossils.
GGG - you and your ICR buddies are simply lying about this one. You should drop it before you humiliate yourself further.
This is a complete fabrication or unrestrained stupidity.
Quit pitching me softballs. You are unable to post a credible “creation science” article. Despite your hundreds of posts, not even one is a credible article showing credible science sourced by “creation science”.
No more mulligans for you. Quit lying.
No lies. You only wish they were lies, because soft-tissue finds in supposedly multi-million year old fossils are becoming a common occurance, and they directly contradict the evo-assumption of deep time. Nice try though.
Fossil simply implies ancient preserved life. They plainly state that it is not mineralized.